At least we have you to force it in anyway

“Tacky”
Well, I don’t hate it. I don’t see why the hate... maybe it’s the interior.
*Sees interior*
Oh shit that sucks
“The interior is slightly better”
Huh...

How hard were you stomping your feet while typing this

what

Back in the 90's and early 2000's, I would have loved to have gotten my hands on a Ford Ranger with the 4.0. I had a 3.0 that was unstoppable, I like the think the 4.0 would have made me even unstopplier. 

In 1996 Ford made a decision that justifies every bad thing that’s happened to them since:

Lmao incredible

Take an hour lunch to go lick all the boots you can find, pal. You earned it.

The Cadillac Sixteen, of course. Insane, impractical, likely would have sold 3 worldwide, but people would think The Devil herself was inside.

So Doug Demuro?

My experience with the MUTCD is 1000 pages of ‘guidance’ and ‘suggestions’, nothing concrete, and at the engineer’s discretion. 

It’s ok to say Chinese

So you know how I said you can’t tell which way you’re looking at it? I believe what you’re calling headlights are the tail lights and the scooper is the front end.

Not produced, but the question was about being made. The 1957 Aurora. No matter which way you look at it, you can’t tell which way are you looking at it. But mainly, you want to stop looking at it. Oh, and it would have cost the equivalent of $130k. 

Quite a broad brush to use over your mommy and daddy issues...

Yay someone validated your preconceived notions

So you’re saying it’s a *profit* deal...

I understand the Wrangler is a boring answer, but no Escort Cosworth? What are we even doing here?

In 2015 I went car shopping for a Tahoe for my wife. The dealership is owned by family friends, so I met my buddy and we drove around the lot for a bit. He asked if I’d looked at the Impalas and I lauuughed and laughed. I had no idea they turned it into a pretty badass 4 door Camaro. That disappointing lump of Lumina…