That is exactly what makes this film fun--it is nuts, and manages to be fun even with Jonathan Majors exuding menace as Kang.  This one really hit all the right notes for me, so I’m genuinely surprised by all the so-so reviews.

Fuck yes I will, thank you for asking.

If it helps, literally none of that should affect your viewing of this movie.

YOU SHUT YOUR WHORE MOUTH

Agreed with the MODOK part, because he’s awesome and worth the price of admission alone.  

At least he ends that with “WORTH IT!” which is really the only reasonable answer. 

Now THAT would be an especially annoying review to read.

Right? The “Avengers Initiative” started as a cool little easter egg/joke at the end of ‘Iron Man’ that only gained traction due to how wildly successful it ended up being. Hell, Sam Jackson was just an “in joke” casting due to the Ultimate Comics Nick Fury being modeled after Sam Jackson)...and then the Hulk came…

They have balanced this extraordinarily well to this point. Honestly to an impressive degree. But, like the comics universes, it’s gonna get messier as they go for sure.

This one is the same.  Seeing Loki (which I highly recommend as it was the highlight of the TV stuff for me) enriches the character, so you get a little bit of knowledge when he first appears on screen.  The trick will be getting people to understand this isn’t the same character that’s on that show.  Or, it is and it…

while I realize this isn’t quite the same thing, I can’t really describe with any accuracy what a great joy it was to take my then 8-year-old to see The Avengers on the big screen. I thought I loved it, but he experienced that movie in a way I’m not capable of anymore. My point being there will be new fans, while…

“title of your sex tape!”

 The comparison is apt (though very poorly done in this review, I’ll grant you)--it really does feel more like a Star Wars movie (one of the good ones, mind you) with it’s creativeness and over arcing plot.  I personally enjoyed it a lot--it’s got the humor of the Ant-Man films woven through without being distracting…

I mean, this really feels like the answer.  Also the question feels like “yeah, Batman is great and all, but why wasn’t there more Robin”--2nd fiddle is 2nd fiddle.

Pretty much every movie suffers from the “where the hell is everybody else?” effect after The Avengers, though. The movies don’t get the same luxury of ‘comic-book logic’ by explaining that “Everyone else is busy with their own stuff, so that’s why it’s up to you and you alone, Squirrel-Girl, to stop Galactus!”

Eternals had what used to be the DCU problem of having too many heroes and not enough time to properly introduce them to give the story any weight (looking at you Black Adam)—I guess the ‘names’ in it were too big for this to happen, but Eternals is the only MCU film I’ve seen where I thought it would have (maybe)…

Is that one good reason: “she’s the Wasp and seriously who cares?”

I don’t think so—she was always the Robin in this scenario, and its’ an Ant-Man movie. She’s good in it and has the right amount of scenes in my opinion—all they could have really added were some emotional back-story stuff with her and her mom (and Michelle Pfeiffer is surprisingly good in this—and still incredibly…

Oh I miss these!!!