spacemoth2
Space Moth
spacemoth2

Exactly; I’m an old who went to U of O in the mid 90's, but I don’t get the hate on safe spaces. I was closeted for much of my young life and learned very early on that most spaces (back then) were unsafe spaces to reveal who I was. Distinguishing and wanting spaces where people feel safe to be who they are without

If Leslie wants to complain, that is fine. But fucking stop making something white male right-wing trolls did somehow a reason to get mad at white women who weren’t in any way a part of this. That is insane.

Your definition of “harass” probably differs from the legal systems definition. In short, yes, these assholes do have a right to post your picture online, yes, they do have a right to write down your license plate, yes, they do have a right to shout unpleasant things at you. Basically almost any one-time interaction

it may be more widespread because of the ubiquity of smartphones

As a former TM lawyer.... The logos don't have to be identical to infringe, they just have to create a "likelihood of confusion." Given that the font is close to identical, the color scheme is identical, the heart is almost identical, and layout is similar, and that the products occupy the exact same market and are

I’m a graphic designer myself and the similarities jump out at me, though they are obviously non-identical. Think of it this way: if you squint, can you easily tell them apart? If it fails the squint test, then you have an issue.

The burden for trademark infringements is not “identical”. It’s “confusingly similar”. This is very arguably such, especially given it is the same category of products.

Ummm, any photo taken on the day-lit side of any object in space is not going to have stars visible. We expect to see visible stars because EVERY damn bit of filmed Sci-Fi shows a star-filled sky no matter what.

The issue is that YouTube is absolutely profiting off of these artists without paying just compensation. In fact, it’s not simply just musicians and artists, but content producers are a whole. I see content from Road & Track being copied and regularly uploaded to YouTube which ranks the video creating views and ad

I had the chance to visit China a few years ago and decided I did not wish to spend my tourist dollars in a country with such flagrant abuse of human and animal rights. Honestly, it’s mostly the existence of the Yulin Dog Festival that keeps me away. I know some will argue that only vegans can get worked up about this

I mean, Piper put the recipes in her book, which she then sold and made money off of. I can’t find the outrage.

Yeah, he is trying to self medicate with anger or something.

Squid seems to frequently offer women advice then get get all offended and rude about it when they don’t trip over themselves thanking him.

More than the masculine-appearing jab, I’m wondering if- as your headline implies- Amy might have been one of those people who only seemed to be supporting Tig.

It’s not news to me. Because I understand Facebook. If you don’t want other people to see what you’re posting or commenting to a friend, private message them. THEY decide what their own wall privacy is. So if they’ve decided to allow wall posts, YOU need to understand that even if you think that recipe is between you

Move on.

I was prompted with a message that I declined, so I don’t see how it just automatically happened... You can decline syncing your contacts

See, Facebook “Community Standards” are total bullshit and I doubt you would find many people here who would disagree with you on that. But the fact is that you just don’t understand how to use Facebook, and instead of learning, you will keep doing dumb things like posting private thoughts in public spheres and

You just seem like someone who doesn’t understand what the hell they’re doing and is getting whiny and defensive while hiding behind an air of moral superiority.

Just because you don’t like what Facebook offers, doesn’t mean it’s immoral or useless. Get over yourself :D

thats AMAZING