Model releases require an exchange of value in order to be valid - so she would have gotten paid, in whatever form the payment was made (it does not need to be money). This payment would apply to any and all future use of the images (beyond the original magazine publication), unless there was a clause stating…

Assuming she signed a standard model release (since the photos were originally shot for magazine publication), I don’t see what she has to complain about (as she would already have given permission).

If you’re going to just recycle someone else’s article, you might want to include the one part that your headline specifically addresses (and is explained by):

If something is in the top 5, it is automatically in the top 10 already.

This story has been widely known for decades.

“...it’s far more affordable than other high-end, high-speed rigs which can cost well over $100,000. And definitely cheaper than buying or renting 50 DSLRs to recreate those awesome shots from The Matrix.”

I don’t think you know what the word “vaporize” means.

I don’t think you understand what a one-man band is.

Do you seriously not understand what a birthday is?

The only photo that depicts him as his true self is this one:

“...though it’s only a single cell organism with no brain, it somehow stretches its tentacle-like fingers in a coherent pattern in search for food.”

Older children, pre-adolescents, adolescents, and adults.

“If Trump wins, will the hats become mandatory?

Receiving a lighter sentence (than one might get if found guilty at trial) is the whole point of pleading no contest* / guilty.

I doubt she was forced into doing this interview against her will - she could have declined the interview if that’s what she wanted. Not to mention - suing Subway and giving press conferences about it isn’t exactly the best way to stay out of the public eye / “move on with her life”. She clearly wants the media and…

Probably a good idea to not take editorial advice from Jordan Sargent.

.

Martin’s room had a walk-out balcony:

Except the asshole in this case is not blaming the victim for what they caused themselves. The argument that the plaintiff in this case has a duty to mitigate damages does not make the cases similar.