That tweet is not racist.

Since figbash dismissed my reply (in my own thread, nonetheless) after also repeatedly arguing with me against points I never made, I’ll just post my responses to their asinine arguments here (since the conversation addresses some of the issues and BS arguments that always come up around here in tipping discussions):

If you’re such a fragile little snowflake that you have to dismiss replies (in that person’s own thread, nonetheless) for shooting down your ignorant and asinine arguments, you may want to stay away from internet comment boards altogether.

My thoughts exactly

Mitigating damages /=/ preventing the damage from happening. This guy is awful and what he did was awful, but this is a pretty standard legal concept and his lawyer would have to be fairly shit to not put it on the table. The point (true or not, I haven’t read any of the documents in the case) is that you can’t just…

“Actually, Whatever You Like Is Bad” — Essentially the logical endpoint of these articles

Donald Trump: “I just kiss, I don’t even wait. Grab them by the pussy, you can do anything.”

I actually quite like this description.

I appreciate your explanations. I think even for some people who are very accepting and open-minded, this can be confusing. I read a story recently about a trans teen and his dealings with various medical experts. His mom was so incredibly supportive and working hard to get her son what he needed to feel right — a…

Although no one will ever see this, I wanted to thank you for answering his question and explaining without judgment. I don’t know why that’s so hard for some commenters around here when someone admits they don’t understand but wants to. It’s nice to see a positive response to someone reaching out, rather than…

It actually has nothing to do with royalties. It is called contributory copyright infringement. One who knowingly induces, causes or materially contributes to copyright infringement, by another but who has not committed or participated in the infringing acts him or herself, may be held liable as a contributory…

Yes. Because that was the best ending to any show. Ever. EV-ER!

That’s not exactly the complete narrative of this mess, but whatever you need to tell yourself to continue this martyr complex thing you have going on...

Flying Squid is a man who emotionally manipulates, abuses, encourages pain and death on people, uses sexist language, and gaslights women on here relentlessly. Here are the receipts, I’d recommend reading up and down the threads for context. He came up with the idea for a poll so he can manipulate more people and get…

You’re right. I reread the actual autopsy report tonight, and nowhere are the words “sexual” or “assault” used. Or “penetration.” Only a description of perceived abnormal anatomical findings.

+1 for getting his username into the GIF

LOL, k.

How does it not make the child a suspect?

False. I’m saying that holding police to a standard to which they can only defend themselves if a gun is pointed at them is a dangerous standard. It takes very little time to lift a gun and shoot it.