Because you stated you like someone else. You seem infatuated with them. Your boyfriend was the last thing you mentioned in your cliff notes which makes it seem like you don’t view him as as important as your friend’s curly hair and scent.

Break up with your boyfriend.

I listen to pop so I am ok with vocal manipulation, but not to the point where the entire humanity of a singer is removed and it really does sound like a robot singer made up by mixing several voices in a lab in Japan, you know. This last album crossed that line. I didn’t even hear it, just the singles that are…

Oh you pressed the wrong button when you first booted up facebook and it asked if you wanted to sync your contacts. Still your fault though

I kinda agree with him. She sounds robotic, particularly on this last album, and I am not comparing her to Bowie. I am compared to how she sounded in 19... The production team definitely had a heavy hand this time. I truly didn’t like this last album.

Zing! Burn! Ah, you got me with that one!!

I think they were both talented cause to me, a recognizable voice and a moving delivery matter more than range and perfect pitch... but if I were making a point about good singing, I wouldn’t pick Cobain, Hendrix, or Bob Dylan as examples. I’d pick someone like Freddie Mercury or even Robert Plant, if he is all about…

It was both. And I’m not a man, I’m a woman. So you’re wrong again.

Say what, now? I mean, some of those things - who sees your comments, your posts, your pics, etc. - you get to control with your privacy settings. And the friend suggestions - I’m not sure what’s unethical about that. The charity - I think it’s actually a GOOD thing when rich, powerful folks set up their own charities…

Serious question: how is FB unethical? I just Googled “Mark Zuckerberg Charity,” and HOLY COW. He seems pretty altruistic.

Luuuucy!

Damn, since those were her claims, yeah those pics definitely will go against her. Shit, I hate to say it, but I guess this piece of shit judge may have made a fair call if you look at her claims of social isolation and social reticence.

So I read your comment re. Colton Haynes....

So, Vulture has deleted whatever Galvin said about Singer, and Galvin has already apologized for the interview.

To be clear, the definition is saying “or [is] incapable of giving valid consent because of . . . deception.”

The deception part, I think, is there for things like a woman pretending to be a man to get another woman into bed (a thing that has actually happened). If it meant, “I was raped because I was lied to.” then basically every man on earth needs to be arrested.

It’s literally in the legal definition.

Rape has different definitions in different states. Rape by deception isn’t a thing in NY, looks like it isn’t in Washington either. Here’s the relevant Washington statute (edited bc duh, Washington not OR)-

What constitutes rape varies from state to state and country to country. According to this link only 12 states recognize some variety of rape by fraud (looks like a few other consider it a different lesser offense) https://rapebyfraud.com/state-by-state…

I’m not sure where you found that definition, but that’s not how legal definitions work. You have to look at the statute in the jurisdiction to determine the definition of the crime and the elements you would need to prove to convict. Also, deception, your highlighted term is broad and ambiguous. What falls within its…