I mean, I think this is mostly an issue for medical places that provide services to people who can get pregnant, regardless of how they identify. It just makes sense to address your whole audience.

Yes, like trans women, who do not menstruate or give birth, but are still women. You can be a woman. Nobody is saying you aren't a woman.

Do you refuse calling someone a woman until you witness them giving birth?

I mean, you’re throwing a fit because someone used a slightly broader phrase, yet you don’t think some infertile women do that? Because I have seen it.

And yet these cis people are brealing their knuckles wringing their hands over it.

It’s also a very sensitive time for the LGBT community. Lord knows straight white women trump that though.

Terfs got suckered into being misogynist.

So when infertile cis women complain about being womanhood being defined by ability to reproduce, what do you say to them? 

I mean, yes. For things like testicular cancer there is a similar push to just say "people with prostates" or "people with testicles".

You’re right, it’s a ridiculous hill to die on, but you seem determined. As someone who won't have children, isn't it weird to be throwing yourself on this sword to defend people who you are useless to?

Literally saw someone say that seeing "birthing people" used is worse than Roe being overturned. I guess having your head all the way up your ass really limits your perspective.

But cis women who are infertile are the first to point out that not ALL women can give birth, so I don't think you can really lay this on trans people.

.

202X “feminists”: men are clearly superior!

It’s like “Voting isn’t effective enough...I must find something even less effective.”

Talks about blowing up government buildings on Twitter.

If only Republicans also believed in trust busting and environmental protection.

Is it Blackstock or Blackstone?

You mean to tell me that the guy who previously tried to overturn Roe may not try that hard to protect Roe now!?

If you suggest that Democrats should “do more”, you’re immediately told that they’ve never had 60 senators, nevermind that Republicans *also* haven't had 60 senators and have done just fine.