Yeah, it’s nuts. I think their logic is basically “If you lived in the light of Christ’s love, the embryo would have implanted.” Unless it happens to them, in which case it’s just a test that god put in front of them to pray on and overcome (and probably somehow turn into a profit-making opportunity.)

I wonder if some of their base will turn when they start going after IVF. All those unsuccessful embryos and the ones that don't get implanted are "murdered".

Even the part of the article about detecting lying is about interactive interview techniques not just watching someone.

Lol! Someone didn’t read their own link.

I had a feeling you'd say that.

I think he just looks skeevy, but seems decent. The rest of them are skeevy to the bone.

They’re single because all the women who would date them were aborted, and now they can’t find jobs because all the people who would have hired them were aborted too?

“As someone who is a manipulative liar for a living..."

Oh, not you. I meant one of the responses to you, which has spent the last week or so going hard for women’s issues and now appears to be a troll. Unless I’m totally misreading it. (Also, I remember the Throwing Shade drama. That was... something.)

Well, at least we have a better idea how trolls get out of the grays now.

So many of the responses to that are just pro-Johnny copypasta. The irony.

I bet you'd love Scientology.

I mean like... Suicide is bad, but I’m glad nobody tried to stop Hitler, ya know?

If a bad thing happens (the video leak) and prevents a worse thing happening (him getting another term)... mehhhhh.

I too can make up things on the Internet.

Some of the difficulty with collaboration could be that apparently everyone around them is on Johnny's payroll. 

I’m all for anyone blocking this any way they can, but yeah... It’s not much of a “Gotcha!” since evangelicals have always openly meant “Religious freedom for my religion only.”

That little shit knows what it did.

You and I have reading comprehension and critical thinking skills, but the masses...

I’m not denying that Chapelle joked that the person was trans (which he has no evidence of). I’m saying that a lot of people are just going to see that and go “The attacker was trans!” so I can see why a journalist might want to avoid including an absolutely unfounded statement in their reporting.