“More than a year after his death in Chanhassen, Minnesota...”

Thanks, that’s great. I’d like the file on the Trump campaign and the Russian government, when you have a moment.

I cackled when they started labeling their paid content—it’s more than half of what’s on the site.

Gawd. Can’t physically roll my eyes up and back far enough for that. No, don’t need an anorectic fame heiress flapping her lip about anything other than juice cleanses and diuretics, thanks. I guess tone deafness is hereditary.

i have been in desperate need of some new cable clips that don’t objectify women and that aren’t breast cancer pink. thanks, joanna!

This is some of the best #sponcon I’ve seen in awhile. Can we expect an Instagram post with KEDSUM 200PCS ADHESIVE CABLE CLIPS, WIRE CLIPS, CAR CABLE ORGANIZER, CABLE WIRE MANAGEMENT, DROP CABLE CLAMP WIRE CORD TIE HOLDER FOR CAR, OFFICE AND HOME served on a bed of sage with heads of raw garlic as garnish? 

Thank u Joanna for ur #bravery

Long time reader here. How do you, personally, use KEDSUM 200PCS ADHESIVE CABLE CLIPS, WIRE CLIPS, CAR CABLE ORGANIZER, CABLE WIRE MANAGEMENT, DROP CABLE CLAMP WIRE CORD TIE HOLDER FOR CAR, OFFICE AND HOME to fight the patriarchy? 

the unique circumstances that have made her feel powerless

Such efforts require a community commitment. We recently had a client whose husband needed a car to get to work. A donor sold her car at a steep discount, another donor purchased it for the client, and a third paid for six months of car insurance.

The argument that feminists should welcome pro-life women into the fold is so frustrating and completely misses the point of feminism. If you don’t think women should have control of their own bodies, you cannot be a feminist. If you don’t like abortion but think other women should have the right and access to make…

I love the idea that citing the legitimately positive economic impacts on women of freely available birth control “commodifies” and cheapens women, but forcing them to be incubators for human life is just fine.

I’m sick of the ‘First Amendment’ justification. Yes, it protects political speech, but that doesn’t mean things like this need to be given such a platform.

my branding suggestion: I thought you said you wanted the government out of healthcare. Decisions should be made between a patient and their doctor, what kind of legal precedent would it set if we allowed disconnected elite politicians to dictate our medical choices?

There is a distinct difference between being open to other opinions and letting people publish terrible, incorrect information. The NY Times seems to be struggling with this lately. There are two or more sides to many arguments. That doesn’t mean they are all correct, or factually supported, or deserving of attention.…

I was reading her list of all the things they provide for pregnant women and I was like “That’s all well and good but none of it would have changed my mind.” I had an abortion because I was not ready to be a mother and giving me child-care options would not have changed that.

‘Szala describes that economic argument as “dehumanizing....”’

When are they going to publish something about a group that’s against abortion and acts on that by giving out free birth control, setting up funds for women who are pregnant and need money to raise their baby, and pouring money into research on birth control options for men?

I cannot with these people and their sympathizers any longer. When you place laws limiting the medical decisions that I can make, medical decisions that have a long and lasting effect on every area of my life you limit my freedom and I am no longer an equal citizen in the eyes of the law. FULL STOP.

Sorry for the bad mani, going to work on getting better nails. (Library copy going back today!)