souptimes
Gidget Castrillon
souptimes

“for making whoopee.”: An allusion to Rickie Lee Jones and Dr. John, which is another allusion - code! - to Ricky Quinones, Jeff Buckley, and me.

“The fact that we’re even talking about real humans with such serious issues as serious drug and mental issues as a “narrative” or “plot point” just shows how far we’ve fallen as a nation.” Exactly. And that no person responded to your comment shows how little any of their audience wants to take responsibility for

“I’m not intelligent enough to dissect your comment.” There’s nothing to dissect. It was all straightforward.

“Pence cannot claim ignorance anymore, that keebler elf was head of the transition team.” If I’m not mistaken, it was Pence that was head of the transition team, not Sessions. That’s exactly why Pence cannot claim ignorance. Well, he can claim it, but it would be implausible deniability.

“Not in any other country would this horseshit pass as government.” Didn’t you write that you have a background in english lit, philosophy, and physics? If that’s true - and if you’re not doing some other commenting shit - then you know better. Not only has this been happening in other countries, it’s also more common

“This stuff’s gonna take some time to sort through. The rest of the world’s going to take advantage of that.” No, it won’t. It won’t because they’re in the same boat and because this is the way their world functions: having dirt on each other, leveraging that dirt, and, more important, they are the power structure

An article posted sometime last summer: “Fourth and final year.” Lol, the amount of criminal fraud and lies in that: it wasn’t the fourth year. It was not, obviously, going to be the last, either. And that lie that it would get better, because, you know, there’s a better form of literal slavery.

“There are like 6 levels of gross in this comment, I’m not even sure where to start.” No, there’s more than that. I’m not up on what the audience’s code words, but I’ll do the best I can with what I’ve figured out about how the years-long privacy-rape is talked out on the internet:

I’m not the president. Is that a fair point, too?

Aimée Lutkin, you forgot to label this as #sponcon #ad. I’m not expecting anything to change anymore, but I still have the right to make that known. That right hasn’t been taken from me, at least not yet.

“Yeah, the headline is wrong.

“...describes an environment that was cartoonishly sexist.

After extensive personal experience with their marketing strategies, this seems like a way to promote the movie. I’d bet my house on it, but it was stolen from me. I’d bet my life, but that’s been stolen, too.

I appreciate the thought.

Please don’t do whatever it is that you’re doing. I know there are other resources. I’ve tried them. I wrote about it on this site. It’s not a secret. It’s written about, but word games are used when it’s written about.

“No one that I can think of (including myself) would wish to be photographed and posted on social media in such a private moment. It is a serious invasion of body autonomy and privacy no matter how “ideal” a person looks naked.” Exactly. The body-shaming is a completely separate issue. First, it’s the violation of

“I started changing in the bathroom stalls.” I always changed in bathroom stalls at the gym. It didn’t matter what kind of shape I was in. But that’s because I was sexually abused when I was very young. For the last several years, I’ve worn a poncho every time I use the bathroom and a floor-length nightgown when I

“That was absolutely wrong and not what I meant to do,” —

Fine, I don’t give a shit. They don’t need to commit intellectual property theft or to human traffick a person for ratings or illegal marketing. What about this isn’t clear to people?

Shouldn’t this be posted in DirtBag or BarfBag?