souptimes
Gidget Castrillon
souptimes

“I was confused at first until I started following the links. Looks like it is a parody of this piece.” I saw it in the article, but I wouldn’t have clicked on it, so I’m thankful that you put it in your comment.

“I cackled when they started labeling their paid content—it’s more than half of what’s on the site.” Do you know when they started doing that? I’m sure they were forced to.

Me, too. You’d think, since they’ve written about me every day for years that they’d take me out of the greys. On second thought, that’s exactly why they don’t, I guess.

This year, exactly like the last few years, you can also be re-traumatized by watching countless strangers cosplay your mother for a little side revenue on social media, movies and television shows without your consent, but because you’ve been rendered completely powerless to stop it, you’ll just have to endure it! In

“Groups like ours work with each woman to identify the unique circumstances that have made her feel powerless, and then we respond to those needs. That can mean going with her to apply for Medicaid; helping her to secure safe, affordable housing; finding child care solutions; or helping her improve her résumé and find

“Wonderful and heartwarming. Absolutely nothing to do with a womans overall right to determine if she wants to give birth.”

“Did they make any false claims?” They sure did. They were also warned in advance not to attend, but didn’t do anything to warn the people who they advertised to on social media.

“Did they make any false claims?” They sure did. They were also warned in advance not to attend, but didn’t do anything to warn the people who they advertised to on social media.

“I know that destroys the narrative of the “evil conservative trying to curtail women’s rights,” It’s not a narrative. If you take away the constitutional right to an abortion, you’re taking away a woman’s rights. That’s fact, not a narrative.

“I don’t see how some of this is any different than neighbors gossiping about my horribly dysfunctional childhood. Knowing they could put it on the Internet so random strangers could read it would just have further traumatized me.” I know all about it. It’s how I’ve been forced to live every single day for over five

Rita Ora, still patiently waiting for the opportunity to sell her soul for fame.

Again, they didn’t give an opinion, but you keep digging in your heels. Your misogyny is worth defending, obviously.

“I kind of adore that he calls it “fizzy water” mainly because I’m tired of being judged when I order it like that in a restaurant.” Sounds tough, truly. “[M]ainly because I’m tired of being judged when I order it like that in a restaurant.” Such judgment, and such fortitude in the face of such inhumane judgement.

“USED TO LOVE BRAD, BUT NOW HE LOOKS OLD. JUST THOUGHT I’D COMMENT THE SAME WAY AS MEN COMMENT ABOUT AGING ACTRESSES ON EVERY COMMENT SECTION ON THE INTERNET. FEEL THE FEMALE GAZE.”

Everything about this is lovely.

“Brad Pitt wouldn’t fuck you with someone else’s dick,” - And so? A person is allowed to give their opinion. It’s not contingent on anything else.

“It is a reasonable passage of time for the man to have aged a bit. [...] He looks pretty decent for 53[.]” Seriously. And it’s not even ageism. There’s a strange cognitive dissonance about *aging* beauty, specifically. If a person tweaks their face, then that’s a moral failure, but if they don’t age perfectly, then

I didn’t.

One of my friends was obsessed with him when this movie was first released, so she dragged me to see this shit in the theater. I said it then: he looked like a white, hairless, blonde monkey. That’s not code or any other shit. It’s what I said to her, and what I’ve always thought of his looks.

I just left the same response before reading yours. Maybe that person wasn’t old enough to remember when it was first released.