See also: Archer

The one with the horse neighing instead of farting? Sometime before the 80s. When I was 10 or so, I remember having the VHS copy from TV.

Marx’s Golden Telephone - when you see it, you know there’ll be a revolution later in the picture.

We got my MIL to watch this movie only because he was in it. “You love the G-rated humor of Carol Burnett!”. She was, uh...not amused with the swearing. She loved the tollbooth jokes though.

Oh, FFS Tim Allen. This iteration of the ‘rich Hollywood elites are victimizing us working folks!’ bullshit is as tired as the ‘just asking questions’ nonsense that started this thread.

NBC logic - a dramatization:

I see someone has tried to watch their latest “comedy” line-up!

It’s not true. There is a “says Mucciol” after that quote. This is all her scrubbed clean version of events. For example, note how she tries to soften her own culpability by framing it as “a late payment” (as in singular), not the pattern of multiple late payments she admits to later.

They published one line from his lawyer’s lengthy statement.

Being woke by its very definition is performative. It’s an authoritative statement that shapes the commenter’s identity - “I am ____” (or counter-identity in the case of “you are not ____”).

Yeah, I took the comment as “the objective facts aren’t as compelling as everyone here seems to think”, but based on some of the poster’s other comments, I totally misread that, for sure.

Remember Yoda’s cave in The Empire Strikes Back? The only thing in it was “what you take with you”.

Well, you’ll have to go to another outlet to read the details of Brown’s counter-claims since Deadspin has decided not to provide them.

I would agree with “a questionable case” solely in terms of the available evidence, which is how I took the “objective analysis of facts” comment to mean. I could be wrong, and you’re certainly correct that her behavior is not immediately disqualifying.

Random look-in at any Chiefs’ internet forum commenters in regard to any off-field issues with their players side they identify with

These excuses are exactly why I object to the surety of their opposite: “they didn’t prove it in court, but I KNOW Hill broke his son’s arm, and he should be treated as such”.

This has always been my issue. The criminal justice system has its flaws, but the court of public opinion (which is what dictates private punishment) operates on ‘guilty until proven innocent’ and has shown to be easily influenced by prejudicial evidence.

The 2nd Amendment is a threat to civil liberty. I say this a owner and regular user of firearms.

They never, ever get this. Dues are, at their most basic, the fees you pay to guarantee your level of compensation. If you don’t lock that level in, guess what? There’s no incentive for the business to give it to you. Zero. No matter how many unicorn boss/company anecdotes you make up, I guarantee the difference…

...or guilty just because of an inflammatory quote* that confirms stereotypes about “violent thugs” and “baby mommas”?