I mean, they’re gonna play for like 3 hours and still somehow miss a bunch of people’s favorites because they’re the Cure and that’s how they do.  I also can’t wait to see them next month!

So... like... order more stuff? I may be having a reading comprehension type issue here but I can’t figure out what the actual advice is here.

The cool thing is that just because you faith and fervently believe in a lie you’ve been told, that in no way means what you’ve been told is not a lie.  

I sometimes feel like these shows should have a button that they can press to add “this person is lying” to the scroll at the bottom of the screen. Then I remember that there are plenty of shows where the interviewer blatantly and shamelessly lies a well and then I go have a drink.

So we raised a bunch of kids on goldfish crackers as a snack and now they like goldfish crackers as a snack.  Got it.

I heard some old dude was gonna be indicted. I think everybody’s waiting around for that... 

No worries at all!

Oddly, I CAN read.  I’m just wondering why the hell this garbage still exists is all.

Are we still doing homeopathic ‘cures’?  Because, like, okay.  The placebo effect is totally real but if you’re going to put fake crap into your kids maybe make sure you know the actual ingredients?  Shit, make it yourself or something. 

Is it your junk?  I feel like it ought to be your junk...

But, and this is important, that is utterly not what I said. And yes! We should talk about climate change! We should talk about it all the time! The firefighters should talk about it and the reporters should talk about it! And, again, please understand, As I said above I have NO PROBLEM praising the people who are…

And you sound like someone who is willfully missing the point of what is actually being said. Once more, then I’m done. The activists? The food pantry workers? The person who paid the lunch fines? Even this apparent douchebag being discussed in this article? They are making peoples actual lives better in measurable…

Praising the person while making no mention of the underlying problem does. And that is, literally, precisely what I am saying.

That is in no way, shape, or form what I meant.

If a person comes swooping in to fix a terrible situation, yes, they are doing good no matter what their motivations. The problem I am pointing at is that the person is praised while the completely fucked up nature of the thing they fixed for that set of people, and only…

Where did she say professional? She’s a self-proclaimed meathead who writes professionally about power lifting. What makes you think she doesn’t qualify as an athlete? Show your work.

Reminds me of all the breathless coverage of the person who paid off kids’ lunch bills so they could graduate. AS IF KEEPING KIDS FROM GRADUATING BECAUSE THEY COULDN’T AFFORD FOOD WASN’T UTTERLY FUCKED UP OR SOMETHING!

Funny thing! David Duchovny, while married to Tea Leoni, was asked about the song, “David Duchovny, why won’t you love me” and if his wife was bothered by it. He apparently wrote a song for her called “Tea Leoni, why won’t you bone me”. Wait, I didn’t mean funny. I meant deeply creepy given Duchovny’s later descent…

No, it really isn’t. If you complement a person on their looks and they think that you’re being a creep that’s on you because you overstepped the bounds of that relationship. If you complement a person on something you perceive as an improvement on their part that implies that they were previously deficient in that…

I wonder if there’s anybody who doesn’t like Chris O’Dowd. Like, that time when they were trying to shoehorn him into the romantic comedy world was weird but he just comes of as an incredibly likeable person even when he’s playing a bit of a clod (The IT Crowd, for example)

My window of utter insufferability predated the internet which is a thing for which I will be forever grateful.