Explore our other sites
  • jalopnik
  • kotaku
  • quartz
  • theroot
  • theinventory
    sol0
    Sol
    sol0

    lol...okay, I was just suggesting a compromise. But I don’t think there’s anything wrong with posing that question to a child AS you give it back to him. I have a 3-year-old - he gets stuff like that. But he also might just say, “No! Mine” And that would be fine too.

    I know, I know, you “sports guys” hate smart people, I get it.

    The player clearly tosses the ball TO the kid. Not in his general direction. TO him. It touches him. I’m sure that there are some legal nuances to this kind of thing that would technically make it that the ball had not become the kid’s property (perhaps we could consult the NFL’s catch rules?) and that legally he had

    He’s right and should definitely not apologize.

    The take is right and you should feel wrong.

    I’d say that claiming ownership of something just because someone dropped it is objectively wrong.

    I’d prefer that when someone is given something, it not automatically become someone else’s property just because they dropped it.

    Wrong.

    Man, can’t believe the crap you’re getting for this. I’m with you ONE HUNDRED PERCENT. I mean, I wouldn’t say he’s a BAD guy, but in that moment, he did the wrong thing when he took something that was clearly not meant for him and gave it to someone else. What he should have done is said, “Here’s the ball that was

    That’s weird - the Home Depot protocol in these instances should be to open up the racist customer’s throat with a boxcutter, shouldn’t it?

    I’m sorry but the Oughts were different times. Like, racism has been pretty taboo and socially risky for as long as I can remember, but joking about sexism, LGBTQ+, rape and pedophilia was more or less okay - edgy and certainly not to everyone’s taste - but not a dealbreaker in almost any context. I’m glad that they

    Wow, you’ve picked some real moral molehills to die on. There’s no excuse for littering so I guess you should keep it up with that, but there are enough scenarios where you might look like a total ass re handicapped spots that you might want to reconsider being a “hero” on that one.

    That would be a bit more expedient, but no, we’ll just keep dragging you along to a better life for yourself.

    Yes, yes, yes to all this. I keep saying - stop trying to get the swing votes - we don’t want or need anyone that would even CONSIDER voting Trump. The voters we need are the non-voters. The people who don’t bother voting because they (understandably (though it’s changed somewhat with how Right the Right is becoming))

    Wow, this closeted homosexual/fairly open racist screamed that word like a pro.

    No one’s asked you how it feels to have a PhD in a while, huh? It’s okay, bud, you did real good there.

    That’s weird - I don’t feel all that anonymous on Twitter - I keep it pretty civil - Kinja comments are where Bad Sol really shines!

    #BoycottGotG3?

    Hmm being Canadian there’s not much joy in it for me - it’s like living next to an insane asylum where everyone’s armed and the crazies are in charge.

    Is there a word for when something is both legitimately, comically funny and legitimately terrifying? I’d say none of this is a laughing matter, but it’s clearly fucking hilarious.