snarkymcksnarksnark
MigratingItch
snarkymcksnarksnark

Sorry, is she catching the most bouquets at any wedding, meaning she caught more than one bouquet at a single wedding? Or, has she caught the most wedding bouquets, cumulative over many weddings? #wordsmatterwhenyou'reawriter

I was talking to a friend one day (male) who commented on a photo in the paper - a near full page spread of a female athlete posing like an athlete, not a model or in a sexual way. My friend said "She would be so much prettier if she posed differently."

CERTAINLY. It's similar. But I couldn't make it long enough into the video (see above) to watch it all the way through. It may be derivative, but I think it's saying something that all of the other schools boycotted it - points to there being just some similar moves here and there.

Wow. I bet you"re proud...as you should be, I suppose.

I'm officially an old, but even in medieval times when I was in high school we had dance teams - we called them "song leaders" but they were definitely dance teams. Plus there were the girls (then) who danced on the field with the marching band...but I forgot what we called them. (I am an old, and a band geek.)

Yes and no. Are you or have you ever been involved in any form of dance? Choreography, much like composing music, is a personal experience and expression. There are only so many notes in the world, too, but just writing them down willy-nilly does not make a composition, if you get where I'm going with that.

It's worse than Skrillex, which until now I didn't think was possible. (Sorry, if you're a Skrillex fan.)

(psssst! Dad, I'm the girl in the family. Sorry I couldn't play football like my brothers.)

Holy shit, I couldn't make it 30 seconds into it b/c of that "music". In the words of dear old Dad "What are you listening to, street repair?"

Exactly! I'm sure he knows more about Alan Turing than the average Joe, because he probably researched the role, but they're actors, not historians, political scientists or doctors.

I don't understand why we care so much about what actors think about anything. They believably (for the most part) pretend to be other people for a living and are prettier than the rest of us (for the most part). The adoration we pile on these people and the pedestal on which we put them is really ridiculous. If he's

Just proves (to me anyway) what a dearth of songs there are eligible for nomination. Blech, boring and trite.

Speaking of John Galt, it's plastered all over the inside of Brandy Melville stores. I asked one of the girls behind the counter why, and she had no idea.

I think most people look awful in skinny jeans, almost without exception, (exception being super skinny people) and though I own a couple of pairs, I find them uncomfortable, too. It's like wearing tights made of denim, and the waistband is always migrating downward, forcing me to hitch them up all the time. I'm not

I started reading this and a few sentences in I thought "I hope Mark wrote this" and I scrolled back up to the byline and... YAY!

You're doing it again. Why isn't defending people of any sort not doing "good work"? Are defense attorneys doing "bad" work when they defend someone who may be guilty of something horrible? Like I asked before - who should be representing these people? Do you have an answer for that?

Then what in hell have you been talking about for the last hour? You've said we should criticize her for taking on (what you feel are) undesirable clients, and questioned whether or not she "works tirelessly" because she doesn't always represent "good guys"?

Why FFS should we criticize her? I don't understand your logic. Why should or would she decline this or any case? Who should take those cases? Only lawyers not married to George Clooney? Only bad lawyers? If defense attorneys rejected clients because they may be guilty of heinous criminal acts, who the hell would

Upon what do you base that assumption? You don't feel she works tirelessly because...? Because she's both a prosecutor and a defense attorney? Because she defends people you don't approve of? Because she takes money for doing her job? Because some of her defense clients are wealthy? Does "working tirelessly" only

You're vociferously defending your point, which has been refuted so many times. What is it about your argument that you feels supersedes the entire basis of the criminal justice system?