if the player is wearing it and the character not it doesn’t really matter then does it? so yeah what the player does doesn’t matter for the character.

you have me there because my main focus has always been D&D or D&D like games. that is one nice shield tho.

same problem it just screams “high value target”

i hope they have something but it seems odd if a mage actually does this and removes their other abilities to just use magic items.. ie wand or shield.

it is a nice looking suit.

but good luck having a mage use a roman shield and cast spells. the only two classes i can think of that can do that are Clerics and Paladin and that is because they use divine magic.

if they have amazing eyesight.. armor that lights up seems a rather poor choice.

maybe someone with divine magic that doesn’t have to worry about pulling spell components out of a bag.. or where mage/sorcerer magic only requires concentration and not intricate hand movements. that kind of glove would be a pain in the rear for a rogue to wear so why would a mage wear it?

but the smart ones don’t wear armor with designs on it that just leave openings. maybe it’s because i play a rogue a lot but i see dozens of places to take advantage of even if it doesn’t damage the person because of some type of magic defense i could easily knock them over leaving them vulnerable for others to…

they technically should depending on the game. you aren’t going to get to spell ingredients easily with those gloves unless they are prepackaged and it would limit your hands ability or agility if that is the means of spell casting. but i would say if you lose the gloves or go with lighter gloves then less…

you typed that despite quite a few of the democrat higher ups paying their female staff considerably less than their male staff?

and yet Elizabeth Warren also pays her female staff considerably less than her male staff. so by all means please tell me how leaders like Elizabeth Warren and Hillary Clinton both paying their female staff less than their male staff are experts on equal pay. and this coming from the party that had a Obama in the…

despite all the evidence showing that the higher ups in the democrat party rigged their primary so that Hillary would win.

the same Hillary pays her female staff significantly less than her male staff?

all while ignoring just how many democrats in power pay their female staff considerably lower than their male staff.

i doubt you’ll pass out since i don’t recall you ever doing this for Obama and he told some major lies during his time in office.. .. but i suppose only keeping tabs on one side is tiring for some. other side gets a pass i guess. like usual.

no what you don’t get is not my argument that you are personally for eliminating free speech. that isn’t it at all. it is be careful how you go about speech that you don’t like because it’s so easy for said rules to eliminate your speech as well because anyone’s speech regardless of how tame it was intended can be…

misunderstanding is also my point too but not just that it’s easy then to silence people by just being offended by them and tables are easily turned in such situations. rather it is easy to extend that to speech that disagrees with you. we see that already as it is with the champions of free speech but only free if…

you might want to think about that and how it can be abused in practice. people get offended by the slightest things sometimes and anything can really be taken in an offensive way if you think about it.

what if Bastion turned into a Tachikoma