So you admit that PC is better, but you still support the inferior? Tsk, tsk. Think: every game you buy for console reinforces the practice of making lesser games.

You’re right. The PC market wouldn’t have a bunch of shitty, shallow console ports. So it would be... better?

Man, AAA titles are a joke. No depth. Besides, the first Witcher was PC-only, and it made the series.

Everyone could have a great experience if they would just switch to PC

Elitist? How about realist. PC games are simply better.

This is why we shouldn’t have consoles.

I hate everything about this image.

I don’t pirate games anymore, since I can’t get patches on a pirated game. And Edgar Allan Bro has a very low tolerance for bugs.

How is this a problem?!

It’s a troubling portent of the state of fandom that I can’t tell if you’re being sarcastic or not

Wait til you see the back yard...

So punish surrendering players. Make so that if they camp at their respawn points, they can’t play another match for X days or something.

I’m just saying, we’ve been burned by E3 footage before.

That’s because the lead writer left in the second season, and things just kept getting dumber after that, per Sorbo’s wishes

If the concept of a game being complete upon release is less relevant is definitely a bad thing.

sweet

Morrowind, Space Empires V, Dominions IV, Crusader Kings II are good examples of depth in games.

Honey, are you that naive that you believe everything you see in the previews?

It’s a waste of resources because instead of making what will likely be just another shallow tablet game, they could be doing just about anything else. Hell, going out and picking up trash on the side of the highway would be a better use of time.