shrillbabyshrill
Faster,Pussycat!Shrill!Shrill!
shrillbabyshrill

Though damn, that would be some issue.

It's pretty gross, actually, in the same way that the Jeremy Meeks fiasco was pretty gross,

Another great piece from She Who Stays Woke, Kara Brown, Our Lady Of Killing It, Teller of Truths and Dispeller of Lies.

I bruise pretty easily - I almost always have a bruise on my arms or legs and I almost never remember how it got there. Most bruises are not from Domestic violence.

I just really don't think it's fair to blame these moms for the fact they got overexcited about their new babies and then someone took the photos and used them for creepy roleplay.

Indian culture has a long historical precedent for a third gender in a way that other cultures like ours do not. While there is a possibility that recognition of third gender individuals is not adequate acknowledgement of trans gender individuals, it's equally possible that by assuming such we're just imposing our own

Or start selling new "love locks" that reach out and lock your arm to the fence or rail you tried to attach it to. Your screams will deter others from making the same decision, and bonus, your withered flesh will be eaten by wild dogs.

My husband has PTSD, and because he developed it because of physical and psychological abuse in his home of origin plus a violent home invasion — not through military service — he already feels like his PTSD is somehow illegitimate. So I find your attitude to be unhelpful at best, and reinforcing the prejudice that

Why are you so interested in defending the torture of human beings? Because the original poster literally said she wanted to torture a human being and thought that was a moral action.

I like how the end of the video captured the raw, animal sexuality inherent in semi-sheer pantyhose. Job interviews and funerals, amirite?

Kat's usage would be the correct definition. We do not in fact live in Ancient Greece.

Why not hate a society that pushes women to have children, no matter what they feel? Hate the society that insists that everything will be totally fine once you hold that baby in your arms rather than the women that fell prey to it.

The problem is, by saying you only feel sympathy for their children and not for these women stuck doing something they regretted, you're ensuring that women will continue to feel ashamed for having these feelings and they won't speak about this frankly to people close to them or anyone else, and will keep these

This has been nuts to watch. So...if the argument is that violent video games are an art, and they don't encourage real-life violence and misogyny, maybe the rabid faction could stop using paramilitary language while planning coordinated online harassment campaigns on anonymous internet boards, and stop obsessively

I explained in the article what spurred it. Did you miss that or not believe it? There were allegations last week that Sarkeesian lied about informing the police about harassment. A critic of hers had a person from the SFPD on audio saying they hadn't heard from Sarkeesian. That was certainly a story I felt we should

(Meanwhile, at the evil fortress of Game-Hating Feminism)

Totilo: I did just as you commanded, my mistress! I posted the story about the bomb threat on the same day a conservative feminist critic said something else about video games!

Anita: Excellent! With Kotaku under my evil feministy grasp of evil! I can continue

Yes and why was Sommers' article entitled so devisively as to make her seem dismissive rather than simply responding to concerns that are perpetuated by polarizing critics? It's almost as though petty bullshit is Kotaku's way of telling the world they aren't happy unless they aren't happy.

A true story of some justice/balance in the universe: