This is kind of weird but I'll share it anyway. I've always been very open about my body and never really tried to hide it. Some people think that I might be a little too open about it but whatever, it's my body. Well, one time a website offered five figures for unaltered pictures of my body and then they made a post…

You know, I don't understand these types of hypotheticals. Especially in this instance, because the article is about black men and black women and their relationship with one another, rather than whether fighting is "okay" or not. The answer to your question can't be yes or no, because the context of the discussion…

Or, perhaps the person whose profession is photography knows from experience what is more efficiently and effectively dealt with in post-production rather than on site, where production costs per hour are typically much higher. Constantly stopping to nitpick about every little aspect of the clothing, hair, etc.,…

Well done. Truly a great victory for feminism.

Hi there,

I am a photographer and I edit my own work as well. Annie most likely doesn't edit her own work, especially for shoots like this.

Right? Come of the clothing bits that had to be altered could easily have been fixed during shooting.

As my portrait professor once told me "Don't leave it for fixing in post when you can fix it right now. Because no matter how good you are in photoshop... you can't polish a turd."

Honestly all I see here is how bad a photographer is and how much work was left to the editor. I know Annie is regarded as a great photographer (and I love a huge amount of her work) there are still ways to photograph and light someone that don't require so much editing.

Ha! Dream on.

This is in such poor taste.

"This is about Vogue, and what Vogue decides to do with a specific woman who has very publicly stated that she's fine just the way she is, and the world needs to get on board with that. Just how resistant is Vogue to that idea?"

Here's how I'm looking at it.

A related reason for why we don't see black actors in fictional roles is probably because the larger white society isn't comfortable (or "used to" or whatever) with seeing blacks in contemporary settings, real or fictional. Mainstream society "knows" black people from being taught about them in school, more or less,…

The more appropriate question seems to be why it was reported in the first place. One could argue that if a waiter wrote a slur on a receipt, people could complain and boycott until they were fired, but if her story had been true and if a customer had been offensive, what were other people supposed to do about it?

They had Grid Boy at the Spainish GP (maybe Euro GP) a while back, but I don't know if its still a thing. Why not both? Let get someone in shape at least...

Well, she's just ignorant. And I would love to say that a person's education is entirely in their own hands, but I do consider it a social duty to help others in that regard.
Like, my mother has ZERO liberal arts education. However, she was the first lady engineering student to graduate from her school. She considers…

No, and here is why. We were not always able to measure the aspects of science that we are today [for instance plant communication, radar, radiation, humidity]. People that claim there is no scientific reason are setting themselves up for failure by default. Even "out-there" scientific theory could explain even the…

RS is taking advantage of the fact that Tsarnaev is attractive, yup. If he "looked" like a terrorist, they could use a similar photo and it wouldn't be seen as glamorous. So they took advantage of the fact that this guy, by virtue of his physical appearance, could appear glamorous.

I feel bad for actors who give up any semblance of privacy or a personal life, but given the absolutely oversized benefits that even marginally famous actors get from their profession, I have a hard time being particularly sympathetic. Even famous industrialists are constantly in the public eye, and they will be shit…