shagishagster
Shagittarius
shagishagster

Wow, I would really liked to have played this. I really enjoy it's concept.

I did not like this game at all, something about the visual design made it a chore to play. The weapons all felt terrible, and I found the humor pretty dated and tired. I really loved FC3 though, just goes to show you how important visual design, character design, and setting can be.

This should be popular with the knuckle dragging tablet gamers.

What a shame I'll never bother with it...

Not a single wood-grain finish. Disappointed .

Not me!

Lame game.

You've got to be kidding, I remember more about these games than some AAA titles released this year.

I would only consider the original release in the big box as a collector's item. Even then it can be had for 40$. If you had a sealed copy maybe you could get up to 200$ for it. The game of the year release and anything without the box are esentially worthless other than to get your hands on the game.

The video game industry is so bad exploiting women like this. When does it grow up?

Yeah what a laugh. This comic is for kiddies by kiddies.

The only way you could be nostalgic for the 80s is if you weren't alive during them.

I think it's pretty obvious that the PS3 was the most interesting console platform this generation. No accounting for bad taste I suppose.

Proudly doing my part to never buy DLC.

I would prefer a game to not require activation on any service. That's why I don't buy any games that require steam unless they are "rental" priced, that don't come with a box and disc. For AAA titles I wait until they are under 15$, for indie titles I won't pay more than $3 usually.

Perfect statement. I just posted myself, in a rambling manner, what you managed to say very accurately in 1 sentence.

Personally I think it's quite a cop-out to blame the internet for gamer pessimism. I really get tired of hearing people that don't agree with a particular case of outrage pretending that it's only a small portion of the gaming populace that thinks that way. The truth is you just really don't know who's in the

It paints an overly pretty picture of how those games actually looked. These bullshots would stand up next to the first Next gen offerings and I don't think that's a very good way to reflect on the history of graphics quality.

It's not how the game looks when your playing it. It's Bullshot. I don't care that the game does this automatically, that is not what the game looks like when you're actually playing it.

But the article says, " That, and we'll be relying on community screenshots to properly showcase what these games look like. No bullshots or company-created shots here!"