It depends. I want you to think very hard on this question: are you a hobo in a 1940s Looney Tunes cartoon? If you answered yes, then the answer to your question is yes.

Also, in your own words, "The fact is that women are just not as good as men when it comes to competitive pro level gaming. I have no idea why, but they just don't perform as good." I explained to you why, and you're saying 'nah.'

China has a great deal of DotA players, but not 'more than the rest of the world', so no, it shouldn't be surprising that the top teams in the world are 'Chinese' and 'assorted North American, European, CIS, Russian and SEA mixed teams.'

Not really.

This is a bit of a cop out, as heroes are purchaseable for both IP (in-game points) and Riot Points (cash shop money), so IP becomes fungible, and so in that way, Runes do become relevant to purchasing because it charts a course that makes 'purchasing runes with IP means I have no IP for champs, which means that if I…

I wasn't saying there isn't an advantage, I was saying that it isn't some inherently biological thing due to 'maleness' or anything. Which is what I've seen a lot of people saying.

Because of culture and conditioning and the environment required to get better. A lot of people are going to tell you 'men are better' and then make up some bullshit evolutionary psychology thing about 'because men hunted mammoths and women picked berries and mobas are like hunting mammoths!!!' But that is pretty…

I guarantee you the 'no females in either pro scene' has more to do with culture and conditioning than any supposed evopsych bullshit about how 'guys have better motor skills because hunting/gathering!!'

No, yeah, post a random picture of a pretty lady in almost no clothing on any image site, anywhere on the internet it seems, and there's like 10 guys ready to tell you 'oh, that's Jessica Villareal, from the Autumn 2012 shoot, before she changed her name to Summer Glee, I remember because of those jean shorts.'

http://www.plotz.co.uk/plotz-model.ph…

Yes, exactly. They managed to have a scene of a woman being raped in the first episode and it wasn't played for titillation or even purely for spectacle - the victim's trauma was a part of the story, it wasn't just a tool for 'this guy is a real bad guy.'

That's my number one issue. I want to like a lot of anime - there's a lot of great concepts tossed out there. A lot of interesting story ideas, with clever conceits like sci-fi or fantasy is supposed to have, but that you could never experiment with in a live action show or major motion picture because it would be…

Ah yes, the wonderful combination of 'fanservice' and 'rape'.

The sincere usage of the word 'mommy' as a self-descriptor is usually a good clue, I find. "Other mommies," "As a mommy," "Becoming a mommy," Egh.

I may have a million dollars, but I'll never have the satisfaction of a hard day's work you poor people have, and for that, which of us is truly richer?

"Well, I've learned all I can about myself, my discipline and social interaction and other people. I guess sports are over."

B-b-but you don't understand, gathering brooms in skyrim is fulfilling because of the complex story and the *incredible writing!*

I love how many nerds rush to sneer at sports, like their pursuits are somehow more noble or meaningful.

I'm confused. It isn't even a list? They just put numbers next to the sentences? That's not how lists work. That's not how any of this works.

Yeah, I always think it's funny how people latch on to like 'Joan Rivers was fatphobic!' when she was also straight up genocidal in a non-joking way several times.