“underground railroad,” or “partisans in the forest”?
“underground railroad,” or “partisans in the forest”?
No, actually, I’m dead set against shutting down the government.
I agree- the wall would be a symbolic and colossal waste of money that would likely not make much of a difference in anyone’s life one way or the other. Or, actually, it would employ thousands of people in South Texas building the site of a future bicycle path from Brownsville to San Diego. I say bicycle path, because…
Here’s the problem: even in a best case scenario, with Democrats winning both the House and Senate in 2018 and the presidency in 2020, we’re still likely 6 or 7 years away from Medicare for all/some form of national healthcare. And, if we don’t take back one of three branches, then this could be a long, long fight.
There seems to be this belief among many that most Democrats are hidden progressives who pretend to act like centrist liberals because they’re spineless shills who don’t have the courage of their convictions.
Honestly, you sound completely unhinged.
In that case, would you agree that even a moderate Democrat who runs in 2020 should be enthusiastically supported by anyone who is against Naziism?
If you truly think Republicans (half the country) are Nazis, then you have a moral obligation to take up arms against Republicans.
No, Republicans aren’t Nazis. There’s an element of the extreme far right that the elections has encouraged, but you cannot call Jeff Flake, Ben Sasse, Marco Rubio, Orin Hatch, etc Nazis.
I actually think the odds of Trump (or another Republican) being elected are not that low. Once you get out of very liberal circles, you meet many, many Americans (including some who voted for Hillary) who are happy with the way many things are going.
Oh, between what’s happening with immigration, healthcare in limbo, and a possible war with North Korea on the horizon, among other things, we’re in a horrible fucking situation.
How do you see a realistic alternate scenario happening at this point? Do you have a good solution to saving the DACA recipients? Not being snarky, I’m genuinely curious.
I have an enormous problem with the overhaul of legal immigration as well. Aside from the obvious moral issues, we have a labor shortage and need immigrants, particularly in tech.
Give Trump the wall and “chain” migration in exchange for saving 1,750,000 or so DACA recipients. The wall will likely never get built, and the rest of the deal can be reversed in 2 years and 11 months when Trump is out of office. “Standing strong” will provide a pyrrhic victory for Democrats, with the real physical…
Yes, it is a problem. Ideally, you’d want to see a greater percentage of people with ownership in the market- or, a greater percentage of people owning a part of the business or economy they’re working in.
According to the labor department, we’re seeing the best wage growth in years. Obviously, it’s not nearly as good as anyone would like.
Yeah, I’d invest in tulips over bitcoin any day of the week.
The stock market corrected- something the market should do from time to time. It may crash, or correct more, and then it will eventually go back up again.
It’s flat out racist when you make generalizations about the sentiments of a minority group, as the above poster just did.
Do you believe that O.J. was innocent?