IT WASN’T UNLISTED. I don’t have the link on this device but there’s a thread on twitter showing how her explanation for how it got all over the internet is bogus. Either it was listed for a time or she sent the link to several people with the intent that it get out. Her last BF Rob K (something) pinned it to the top…

Here’s the thing. This isn’t about Chris, it’s about false accusations and co-opting the me too movement. She’s told 2 provable lies, both having to do with the Medium platform, and her essay and statement today are contradictory and include red flags that she wants to control or hurt Chris in some way. As for her…

Two things. First, Chloe’s dishonesty doesn’t negate your own experiences. Second, have you actually looked into the facts before deciding “he’s a monster” or are you going on feelings and pull quotes? There’s a multitude of evidence, mostly her own statements, that show she isn’t telling the truth. Her statement…

A+ photo to article match. Skeptical girl calls bullshit on Kristjjjjjen. 

It's part of the puzzle.  If that was the only defense I would be on the fence. From the beginning I thought there was something off about the story. I received a ton of shit for voicing my doubts so I looked into it. I could go point by point showing exaggeration, intentional omission and misdirection, and things…

If that was the only outliers maybe, but in combination with the other facts it's telling g.

Moose are fucking assholes! Dumb city folk try to take pics and have their kid on its back. Don't believe the Bullwinkle hype.

I completely understand the passion on this issue but my experience has been the people who are unable to see this case individually have close friends and relatives that have suffered abuse. The women I’ve encountered that have survived sexual assault and abusive or controlling relationships themselves read the essay…

Why is it so hard to believe that she wasn’t being honest? Is it so hard to believe that a man could be innocent?

In order to believe Dykstra you have to believe he changed from someone with good relationships with 3 women to treating her badly and then back to being a good partner. 

Except the 3 women he had relationships before Dykstra all said he wasn’t abusive and his wife denied it as well.

Bullshit. If you think Loeb & Loeb is willing to fuck itself over for 1 client you don’t know anything about the legal industry. A firm the size of L&L has so many different divisions its doubtful the attorneys know each other.

Correct, by internet mob justice is dangerous all around.

She also changed “sexual assault” to sexually violate and made other edits. When people called her out she changed it back to assault but let the other edits and gave a bullshit excuse that Medium itself said couldn’t happen.

You should check out @YNB on twitter. She supports Chris.

4 months earlier she wrote a post on reddit claiming a female former friend “singlehandedly” destroyed her carerr.

Uh, the ONLY reason she consented was because she didn’t want to lose him. She didn’t write ANYTHING that would be considered bullying or coersion. According to her, he said his last relationship broke up because they weren’t having sex. I understand your point but as this has gone on people have consistently blended…

The law firm and the attorney that did the investigation would have a LOT to lose if they cut corners. The report is discoverable in litigation and the attorney could be called for a deposition. I don’t understand why people refuse to believe that a woman isn’t telling the truth or that a man can be innocent. 

She never accused him of sexual assault. She used those words (and then changed them; another issue) but said she “let” him sexually assault me. Ok, 1st you can’t consent to be a victive of a crime, 2nd i was the pull quote but if you continue reading the paragraph she says she always consented because she didn’t want…

Elves have exceptionally long lives.