I think you mean .095 turnovers per drive. 0.95 sounds more like the Giants (actually, .206, the worst in the league).

"When pressed for names, the then-Rangers manager declined to answer—stating that 'it was a long time ago.'"

I see what ya did there. +762*

I read that as "dongs." And that works fine for me.

There's not enough snark in the world to cover how insane this is. I am a longtime Braves hater — calling yourself America's Team in any sport earns my hate — but I always admired their pitching staff from the 90s, and Maddux first and foremost. He was everything a pitcher should be.

Dude, relax. I actually agree with most of what you say here. The Pats just bug me.

Well, I think it's clear that Luck was involved. :) In the case of the Giants' well-earned SB wins over the Pats, I think it was a different kind of supernatural force. What's the word for it? Hmmmmm.... Oh yeah... KARMA.

I know what fluke means. It doesn't apply here.

Correct. It's outstanding concentration, resulting in an outstanding catch. That it looked "flukish" to you is utterly meaningless.

"You don't find that ironic that players never speak bad about Mr. Snyder and everyone else can't stand him?"

One sure sign someone doesn't really know much about football: calling an outstanding catch a "fluke play."

The worst part was the playoffs every year except one, amirite?

Go play in the highway, David Duke.

You don't "inherit" two Super Bowl wins. One, maybe you could make that argument. Not two.

WHY DINCHA JUST PISS OFF? YA DOTTY WEE SKID MARK!

I just finished reading it. Harrowing, and without a real happy ending.

That's possible. But I still refer you to point 3 above. Had I not kicked barefoot, my career would have been over. I could not get under the ball sufficiently to lift it or hit it in the sweet spot.

It's my day in the sun! :)

Look! I'm famous! Today's Washington Post:

Look! I'm famous! Today's Washington Post: