Why draw attention to this guy doing this, though? Don’t you think that has the potential to draw negative interest to this and get him in trouble?

Subjecting people to ideological purity tests (like this article does) is what’s suspect. You act as if the only possible way someone could not agree with Kaepernick’s protest is if they are a full-fledged bigot.

Her friendship with Scalia reflects a trait that’s now viewed as a weakness, but is actually more or less…

I like a lot of what you write. This - the idea that everyone who holds differing political views than your own should be shunned/punished, coupled with the assertion that one of the nation’s most accomplished, and beloved, jurists is “dumb” for not agreeing with you - this is not your finest hour.

Her job is not to write op-ed’s. Her job is to uphold the letter and spirit of the law, which is precisely what she’s demonstrating that she’s able to do here, in spite of her own opinion. If her disagreement with you doesn’t affect her professional stance, why does it matter to you?

That, or some people can put aside political beliefs when establishing friendships, either staying away from that boundary or knowing what buttons not to push. Obama and Tom Coburn, for example.

I don’t want to live in a world where a Surpreme Court justice retires and has an opinion that Barry disagrees with.

“good on race and justice”

“I disagree with them but it’s their right to do it.”

You either agree with EVERYTHING Colin Kaepernick says and does or you’re a Nazi.

Talking to yourself is an early sign of dementia

If her answers frighten you, then she shouldn’t be asked scary questions. She has as much right to her opinions as the “hero” Colin Kaepernick does. So quit crying about it. One is no more right or wrong than the other.

Oh thank god, Barry Petchesky, sports blogger, is here to remind us all that his views are right and a supreme court justice is saying dumb shit. I’m honestly at a loss at how stupid and clueless that is.

“by claiming the company routinely published “thinly sourced, nasty articles that attacked and mocked people.””

“Equality feels like discrimination” when yall will believe a woman’s claim with no proof but gladly condemn a dudes claim with the no proof. That’s fine, of course women need the benefit of the doubt given the systemic discrimination they’re gonna face. But if you say you’re doing it in the name of equality it’s…

“When Savitt began at Yahoo the top managers reporting to her … including the chief editors of the verticals and magazines, were less than 20 percent female. Within a year and a half those top managers were more than 80 percent female,”

“When Savitt began at Yahoo the top managers reporting to her … including the chief editors of the verticals and magazines, were less than 20 percent female. Within a year and a half those top managers were more than 80 percent female,” the lawsuit said.

if you compare pictures of super bowl kaep and and modern day kaep... i think you could convince a lot of people he’s no longer a super bowl caliber quarterback and is now just a social-justice activist

Dude looks like an angry muppet.

Since when does the losing team take a knee?