Not believing anyone is a reasonable take until you learn all the evidence. This is assuming you are supportive and not a dick to alleged victims until you have enough information to form an opinion.
Not believing anyone is a reasonable take until you learn all the evidence. This is assuming you are supportive and not a dick to alleged victims until you have enough information to form an opinion.
For a job that a motivated 14 year old could probably perform with a few hours of training? Yea, kinda.
Unfortunately for the workers, Harvard can simply switch over to a program that hires students to work in the dining hall, with their pay going towards their tuition. Many colleges across the US do this. Which means that a guy like Tommy from Charlestown, who prepares the fresh fruit, is easily replaced by a student…
Isn’t this the sort of stuff that killed Gawker?
The band members were free to make their statement. The station owner is free to make his decision. And we’re free to say he’s a dumbass.
Well, as you folks on this blog love to constantly point out, the First Amendment doesn’t protect you from consequences of your behavior by a non-state actor. They made their choice, and now they’re paying for it. No sympathy here.
why do you hate trans people?
and one could argue that most memoirs, from a factual standpoint, are not true. they are one person’s totally subjective account of a series of events culled together into a fabricated narrative structure or framework.
memoir falls under the distinction of creative writing for a reason. it’s not journalism. if you…
I’ll disagree with your premise. I think a journalist has a right to report on something that is true and serves the greatest good. In the case of a pseudonymous author, there are times when their identity being known could endanger them or their readers. Suppose there is a writer that lambasts a dictatorship in which…
while i find the overall proposition this piece enticing from a logical standpoint, i find the argument that supports it entirely lacking.
yes, the point of journalism is to convey truth and true things to the public - that is what makes journalism a civic pursuit, and an admirable one. however, there’s a big…
Cool, you’re in the public domain, let’s all publish everything about Mr. Nolan...Phone numbers, taxes, income statements, address, everything! Anyone know anything, post it here!
“We may add nothing of import, but we do so *loudly*”
A very reasonable argument.
Because as journalistic policy, opposing the reporting of the true identity of a globally famous pseudonymous person is insane.
Did you just equate an author using a pseudonym to a basketball player in a mask?
“ potential sponsorships away from his minority-focused team and towards established, white-owned teams instead.” I don’t know why any sponsors would be hesitant to associate their hard-earned names and reputation with this fine litigious fellow.
No, my whole reason was that the author continues to push this artist in MULTIPLE articles, but this isn’t her blog or own site...this is a public site. She does the same with Beyonce, Rihanna and the Obamas...I get it.
Vulv Volvo.
Seriously. Anyone who celebrates this garbage has absolutely no right to complain about gun violence.