Some people just not gonna understand what SAS is eluding to. It's black and white, and that's it.

LMFAO

Great point. But again, there's scenarios where women are reacting violently. But couldn't agree more with what you said. There's nothing that that justifies a violent reaction other than a violent attack.

Agreed. In this Ray Rice situation, this scenario does not apply.

Oh, ok. I get you. Good point. When you put it like that, then I can understand why people would have a problem with it. But I still think he didn't mean to tie it to the Rice situation. Just speaking in general. But yeah, Ray Rice got off way to light, and you make a good point.

Jeez, why are you taking me out of context? My problem is that they're taking what SAS out of context. There's nothing wrong with diffusing a situation to prevent something from happening. All parties can do things to diffuse a situation. I understand there's situations where women don't do anything to get a violent…

That's a great point. But there are women who get violent, and that's what SAS is eluding to.

Um....ok. Maybe we've been through different things, and that's ok. I understand there are situations out there where a woman does nothing still is abused. But I understand there's situations out there where some woman do things to provoke a violent reaction. In both cases, there's not justification for a man…

Huh? Where did I say that? There's nothing wrote where I justified hitting a woman. I'm not justifying what Ray Rice did. I think he should get the book thrown at him. I'm talking about what Stephen A Smith said. So don't try to change up the argument. Because that's different than commenting on what SAS said.

With Ley's logic, if you get things stolen from your car, and you didn't lock your door, you're a thief apologist for telling the person, "why the fuck didn't you lock the door?"

Great analogy.

She's taking this WAY out of context. Believe or not, there are women out there that will provoke men to react violently. I know that's crazy, because that requires going outside your bubble. But just because you can't fathom doing something to provoke violence, as someone who's been through it, seen it, heard of…

I wrote, "most of the time, have great things to say".

I think you're right on the mark here. Deadspin is sensationalizing this for clicks. I watched it this morning, and at no point did I feel what SAS said was wrong. His stance on Michael Sam was 10 times worse IMO. But this site is reaching at anything, which is funny. There's nothing wrong with trying to diffuse…

Great analogy. Deadspin always trying to reach. I don't see anything wrong with what SAS said. They act like there's women who don't attack men violently, and they get hurt when a man is defending himself. Still no excuse for the man to react violently. But the woman could of done something to diffuse the…

I guess none of you had to deal with a combative black woman LOL

GOAT...EOS

As someone who like First Take, and generally agrees with Stephen A, what he said was deplorable.

But it makes you look very stupid and hypocritical when you've been through discrimination, and want to deny other people rights and opportunities. It doesn't make sense.

Good for you. Science or evidence has never failed me either. Unfortunately for you, you're gonna continue praising a sky daddy for no reason, and waste your life obeying this entity that not shown any evidence in existing. Yes, I don't know for sure. But there's enough evidence, that I can seek out today to…