sarcastro6
Sarcastro6
sarcastro6

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Ha!  Okay, I’ll agree with that analysis.

“Lindelof’s Watchmen is a continuation of sorts, set in the same world as Moore’s book, the events of which are considered historical in the new series.”

Yeah, that’s a “sequel”. 

Hey everybody, look at this idiot!

All three of those are lies, though.

Seems like you’re as thin-skinned as he is.

At least this time we can link them directly to the White House tweet in question, at least until they unlawfully take it down.

Not if you want that honor to carry any meaning with it.

“Perhaps one more set of eyes”

I see what you did there. 

Why be charitable, though, at this point in time?

Turn them in, please!

Real life is the Evangelical Right’s version of The Purge.

Their target audience is famously bad at gathering meaning from text, so yes.

When people like that mention “hard questions about God” they mean things like “Is God awesome or super-awesome?” and “Is God fully on our side or entirely on our side?” rather than anything of substance.

I hate the people (probably the same ones) who get to their work parking lot and then spend five minutes carefully backing their car into the spot instead of just fucking parking.

I hope you responded “all of it” just to see how they’d react.

I still have hopes of one day seeing in person the magnificent grandeur of Car Talk Plaza.

Not going to bother responding to Brock down here in the greys, but it’s worth mentioning that California makes no distinction whatsoever under the crime of “rape” as to the body part (or something else) used to make the penetration, and in fact specifically states that it applies irrespective of the part/object

Fine enough, but not top 5/10.

I mean, a world without guns and without Meghan McCain sounds like the very definition of a win-win to me.