It is not entirely subjective. For instance, if you write horrible, poorly punctuated run-on sentences, then they can be objectively pointed out. Whether or not you enjoy horrible constructed sentences is the subjective part.
It is not entirely subjective. For instance, if you write horrible, poorly punctuated run-on sentences, then they can be objectively pointed out. Whether or not you enjoy horrible constructed sentences is the subjective part.
By “shit ton,” you mean the same five references to pop culture from his childhood?
It is so overused it has lost all meaning. Any connection to the latin root is destroyed.
They didn’t speak to an entire generation. That is just a thought of pure vanity, mistaking your experience for everyone else's.
Influence does not equal genius, despite what you think, or else I guess the true geniuses of the modern world are those who work in advertising.
I prefer to think of it as “The Patriot Way.”
Can we begin to put some meaning back into the word genius by not using it to describe a decent musician?
Yes, so go on and explain your point.
I’m sure they will be well taken care of and not say anything further.
How is it in the NFL’s interest that their most famous player be found to be a petty cheater?
Except it is important, it’s cheating. Also, how about the arrogance of an organization that cheats, not because they need to in order to win, but apparently just because they can? A coach would get fired from Pop Warner for something like this, but billionaires and millionaires will get off the hook.
“If you can’t prove he did it, he’s innocent.” Well, its obvious where Brady gets is moral character from. Also, of course, I’m sure Mr. Brady feels that OJ is innocent.
Your description does not really make him look unintentionally racist, but rather intentionally racist.
I teach kids and some of then were and probably still are perplexed that Africa is a continent with many countries, cultures, and languages within it, so it doesn’t surprise me that they cannot differentiate like that.
“The sourcing and background are worse than a Rolling Stone article about campus rape.” Absolutely, having documents and emails from the people involved is far worse than relying on a sole source and not checking her story.
It seems very typical of much of the laziness current in what passes for thought. I only have my own observations, but it seems like much of social media is reliance on only a few tropes, the most popular being hyperbole. It’s like certain people can only then think hyperbolically, with the unpleasant consequences to…
That was a fairly comprehensive defeat. Whitlock will surely claim victory on twitter soon.
The third one read as a bourgeoisie desperately trying to wipe the stink of his or her class off of them.
I don’t always agree with Geno, but when I do, I agree completely.
"oldest dependent clause"?