For an offended internet crusader who’s been told by multiple people that you’re being a total jackass, you really don’t know when to stop.

No insults, and yet you’re the one here being bootyblasted over an internet comment you didnt bother to read.

I’ve already written my thoughts on that. Google “A Lawyer Revists Ace Attorney” and you should find it

No insults, huh? Do you actually *not* know what the Dunning-Kruger effect is then?

There was absolutely nothing in my comment indicating disbelief or contempt whatsoever. You, the person who fired off an accusatory emotional reaction and then proceeded to insult me after I corrected you, are reading into it things that aren’t there.

I’m surprised you can both critically fail to read my comment to such an extent that you have a snowflake-level meltdown over an imaginary strawman, and yet also possess enough reading comprehension to be able to know what the Dunning-Kruger effect is.

I’m a great lawyer actually, thank you!

100% agreed.

I’m sorry that my response to an absurd, emotional comment that accused me of saying something I literally didn’t say was “dismissive.” Please send all further emotional outbursts in response to unread comments to trump@whitehouse.gov.

It’s not a horrible idea. The situation described in this game is undoubtedly something that happens sometimes. How often is not only something we can never truly know, but also something that tends to get either inflated or minimized, sometimes by people with something to prove.

Yeah, that’s totally a thing I said.

What does that have to do with what I said, or what you said? I mean, we were both literally talking about that one single ending, not the whole game.

Does it hurt a witness’ credibility, sure. Instantly earning you a not guilty, no. The difference between those two things cannot be overstated.

Some simple research would have revealed that the victim having a mental illness doesn’t absolve you from criminal charges, for one.

Oh boy. I’m a criminal attorney and this is, shall we say......... “problematic”?? That’s the word the kids are usin’ these days.

This tournament was honestly pretty awesome. It allowed a lot of unusual Pokemon to get some use and attention and because it was so new, it was super fun to watch! I hope they do more with strange restrictions like this.

Yes, it’s almost like I was referencing that exact incident in my comment.

Ohhhhhhhhhhh boy.

That second letter... oof. Let’s just assume he isn’t willfully leaving out important info. I agree completely with the Doctor’s advice.

This is especially stupid because it’s totally plausible for Brock to have a Lucario and Misty to have a Piplup. If the issue was including some of the more popular newer Pokemon in the movie even though it’s set in Kanto, there was a way to do that without writing out two of the most popular and important characters.