Again, you realize that prostitutes veto/refuse clients, right?

I read an interview with her and calligraphy is something she ended up using as a side hustle once she started acting. She did invitations of weddings and special events so I’m not surprised!

And she wrote the letter in exquisite cursive. That alone says it all.

A lot of them have absolutely no social skills, their entire understanding of others behaviour and social dynamics comes from movies and television, their entire understanding of sex comes from internet porn videos. I read Eliot Rogers manifesto, there is no way his social interactions were normal. His interactions…

That’s the thing though. These incel guys don’t want “regular women.” They think they are entitled to supermodels. They abhor women who they think are too fat or ugly, which is what they think of most women. They only want the “Staceys”, the tall, skinny blondes with big tits and no cellulite or stretch marks.

This is why I wish sex work and sex workers weren’t so stigmatized. I’ve long thought sex work needs to be legal, regulated, unionized, and taxed.

One of the things that’s so fascinating to me is that the original term, involuntary celibacy, was coined by a queer woman. And there are lots of folks (queer folks, folks with disabilities, fat people, etc) who do struggle to find love and sexual partners because we live in an oppressive and disgusting society, but…

What I find interesting is that this is the only area where he seems to prioritize “collective good” over “individual freedom”. In every other context, he says that if you need something (healthcare, a job, etc.) it’s on you to get it and it’s not society’s responsibility to guarantee that you have it. But when it…

If we’re going to be ruthlessly efficient about this like he wants, just develop a cultural norm where all the incels ship off to their own little island. Then they can’t kill any women. Problem solved.

No. Saying we need to ‘do something’ is useless. Saying we need to do something about the guns at least recognizes the actual problem.

It’s just enough to drive a modern person mad to listen to these incels from the internet area ensconced in their comfortable secure lives complaining about the fact that they’re discriminated against because they don’t have enough sex. It’s like, Jesus get a hobby. For Christ’s sake, you — you — ”

I can only imagine her nerves, with this historic wedding and her family being a bit crazy. Or, maybe this is a weird angle, but maybe a form fitting dress might have let people sexualize her in a way that would have been uncomfortable for her. She looked beautiful. That level of scrutiny would make most people lose…

Co-signed. I’m not a fan of lace or beading. I liked the simplicity of the dress, and the neckline, and she could pull it off—which is saying something.

I really liked it.

The neckline was similar to Princess Mary’s dress (an Australian normal person who married the Crown Prince of Denmark). A similar fitting snafu happened there, she lost a lot of weight so it hung slightly weirdly on her shoulder. Didn’t totally ruin the look by any means but was noticeable.

I was glad to see no lace!

I can see why people are disappointed, it was really simple and that’s not everyone’s cup of tea. But there’s no way that dress didn’t fit her exactly as it was intended to.

Am I the only one who really liked the wedding dress? It was clean, modern, no freaking lace in sight, looked gorgeous to the touch, and appropriate for the occasion without being stodgy. Yeah, the night-time reception dress is cooler in all ways, and I’d rather wear it if I had a zillion dollars and a fancy party to…

I loved both the dresses! The first was so elegant. Perfect for the situation-I love that it read “understated, confident, and classy” rather than “princess fantasy.” The second dress, while equally beautiful, would not have been appropriate for the ceremony but was dynamite for the reception.

Disagrees.