I'm like Leo during the R.O.C., but I think that the companies make their products less durable than they could so that they can continue to make money on what would otherwise be an individual expense. It's called vertical integration, and it happens. That's why select companies make their products have pieces only…

I have an R/C car that does 150 plus MPH.

False.

Morgan Plus 8. It's not fast, but just look at it! The appeal of a Morgan is akin to that of a Saab - it's a car that fools other motorists into thinking you know a secret they do not. Among the only "exotics" nice people can drive. You are a gentleman and a scholar, Plus 8.

Not really based on this baby, but I keep getting the feeling that BMW is starting to Honda it up (which is to say lose its way).

Amen, sister!

Oh shit, really? I was just conjecturing... that's really fucked up! Where was that? I have a picture of them stumbling out in the middle of the Vegas strip, both holding Grey Goose bottles and singing... oh, I don't know, What's Up by 3 Non Blondes. Not based on anything. Just my strange, twisted mind.

It's not THAT dull. It's no Corolla. For the money I guess it is pretty bland, but I think that it looks pretty good without going all Lambo-on-yo-ass. Good news is that Chris Brown won't get one painted like a tasteless fighter jet. I think that it's nice to look at.

That table almost stuck the landing, too!

I think that genre should preempt price. A Rolls-Royce or Maybach is undoubtedly different from an Enzo or Gallardo Superleggera, and a GT-R compared to an SL isn't really telling. You should have categories like "Supercar", "Luxury", "Expensive Sports Car", "Cheap Sports Car", "Daily Driver", or "Super Sedan". Stuff…

Oh, and Paris Hilton didn't drive one. Her chauffeur did. Screw rich people, right?

I love the SLR SM too. Except that if you had one you'd look like such an egotistical asshole. *coughcoughkanyecoughwestcoughcough*

I'm not sure if this really fits the spirit of Forgotten Cars (do they have to be vintage-y), but the 2012 Lotus Exige S just isn't ever mentioned anywhere. The only reason I'm aware of its existence is that I'm subscribed to Drive, and Mr. Harris drove one. As I recall, he said it was chuffing good, too.

But I wouldn't want one for 50k. I would rather have the most basic of base Caymans.

It's so ugly, it sounds awful, it's ridiculously expensive, and it's so ugly. Did I mention that I think it's ugly? The design feels unbalanced, but not in a cool way like the R8 or the 458. It reminds me of a dog pooping, much like Jeremy Clarkson and the Crossfire. And those gills... and the headlights... and it's…

Yes sir. I was gonna use this one, but then you took it.

Yeah, but people drive without licenses already, and if it were harder to get a real license, then the number of unlicensed, uninsured operators would go up. That's my two cents, at least.

For some reason, I just don't like how this Aston looks. To me, Aston Martins are a bit understated, for supercars at least, and the front of this one is too batshit. The carbon splitter on the front makes it, and here comes some heresy, ugly. The rest of Big Sexy here is tres, tres bon. But the front end is awful.…

RWD too! Maybe we'll see this baby on Hoon of the Day sometime soon.