s73v3r
s73v3r
s73v3r

So you admit your knee jerk reaction was baseless horseshit?

The biggest stars are also culpable as they take the lions share of funds available to pay the actors.”

Where do you see the author calling for the song to be banned?

Disagree about what, exactly? Because the way it sounds, its like you disagree with their right to exist. Which does make you a bigot, and does mean you should shut up.

Not gonna happen.

That’s not a valid critique, especially considering those things are things that every fucking job should provide.

What the fuck is your point? Other people have things worse, so these people should not ask for better?

Blah blah blah, bootlicking.

Not really buying it. One of the reasons they still got Harrison Ford to play Indy is because people want to see him as Indy, not AI ActorBot #583

Bullshit. Who is going to see Generic AI protaganist?

Why would someone want to go see an AI actor?

Because then you have to pay artists.

Nope. Literally everything you’ve said is a fucking lie. Because you know that the truth would not have people on your hateful, bigoted side.

A robust public transit system gets us that in a far, far, far more efficient, safer, and cheaper way.

“The flaw in that argument is that (1) Facebook makes money on ads, not content that people share”

“You’re describing a thumbnail”

“This law makes Facebook pay everytime a user posts a link”

“I’m not overly familiar with this, but it reads like they would charge Meta if a user posted a link to a news article?”

Has it benefited them, though? If Facebook grabs and summarizes their content in such a way to try and keep people from leaving their site, how have the news sites benefited?

Anyone who wants to claim this would be good for the industry as a whole and good for consumers as a whole needs to explain how the Discovery + Warner Bros merger worked out for workers and consumers.