romeoreject
Romeo Reject
romeoreject

Jesus Christ... Alright, in order:

...I distinctly remember people calling for Trump’s head, and multiple impeachment attempts. This isn’t a “which side of the fence” are you on kinda deal. Both sides are guilty of this, and both should be called out for an obvious conflict-of-interest.

...You do realize nuclear fission reactors are quite literally swimming in massive amounts of water, right? Ordinarily we just waste it as steam and let it escape out of the cooling towers. Or we could instead get hydrogen extraction from that same water vapour. We aren’t pumping additional water for the NPM or

A single NPM (A small device added in to a nuclear reactor, and can have multiple installed in a single reactor) makes 50 metric tonnes of hydrogen per day. Again, that’s just one NPM, in one reactor. Scale that across a few thousand NPMs, and you can see that extracting a meaningful amount of H2 is a laughably easy

Eh... That whole cabinet, Trudeau included, seems to consider ethics a secondary concern. It was hardly the only time that government got caught with its hands in the cookie jar. It reflects extremely poorly on the Liberals that they’ve had so many public scandals.

Nuclear is an extremely easy method of getting hydrogen (And we get hydrogen in current fission reactors; Future fusion reactors would actually consume hydrogen, not create it), and in the worst-case-scenario, peak spikes in renewable generators could be used to create hydrogen from electrolysis, rather than just

To say nothing of the expected automated trucking to come down the line. Unlike cars, a long chain of trucks driving a constant speed on a highway is a comparatively easy to program thing.

Oh, didn’t take too long, there’s one now!

Right? My ideal fob would be a couple millimeters thick, and maybe twenty square centimeters. I don’t need a colossal fob that’s over a centimeter thick and forty square centimeters.

Honestly, it’s not even that hot of a take, that should be the default expectation.

A company, whose sales and thus share price, would be dramatically affected by incentives, wouldn’t even approach that level? What?

I’m not sure that was the lesson to learn. =|

*Checks Reddit*

You should “give-a-fk”. Investing in to something when you’re in a political position is a great example of conflict of interest. If Tesla asks for something, and she votes yes, there’s no way of knowing if she honestly felt that was the right course of action, or if she’s pumping her own stock. If she helps pass

Oof, I’m sorry, but this screams conflict-of-interest to me. When I was on the local hockey board, we used to make one member who had a jersey company leave during any voting when it came to equipment (Even if it wasn’t equipment he sold), because all of us - him included - didn’t want the possibility of steering

What the next round of EV incentives might look like, for one.

I think the reason they’re still a thing is because it provides an easy out for manufacturers on warranty claims if you aren’t abiding their guidelines. Just my guess, however.

...Putting nuclear reactors on the ship would not generally be smarter. Nuclear power plants aren’t the kind of thing we should want private companies and untrained staff being in charge of, given what can go wrong even in a static environment, let alone in the middle of a tumultuous sea. Besides that, if an when

Electrolysis implies you’re spending energy to separate out hydrogen and oxygen - that’s not what’s happening to the water in nuclear fission. Instead, the heavy water is being nailed with enough force to not only cause it to steam up, but to physically force apart the components of hydrogen, oxygen and a neutron. The

I don’t disagree there, especially if we’re talking jet engines (IE, big passenger aircraft), though there’s still a number of propeller and turbo-prop long distance aircraft that would switch over beautifully to hydrogen. The aircraft for me to get to the three provinces beside my own are all turbo-props. No reason