rogerbacon
RogerBacon
rogerbacon

Star citizen isn’t selling that either though, SQ 42 has been MIA for a long time and all they seem to be doing is making a sandbox.

You can’t erase your past mistakes, but you can do your best to earn back the trust. HG is a clear example of a company that are doing their best indeed.

I can get up and walk around in VR, but Space Legs and Atmo planets is still on the to-do list. Until that happens, other games are offering those features just as DU, NMS, Space Engineers, and even old games like Noctis IV.

Yeah but SC solved the problem.

They already did. Elite dangerous is great and improves with each update. NMS is getting a huge crazy update next week. Dual Universe is now playable in EA I think?

They said you can own more than one base, I am wondering if you can build a new base right near an old one.

Nah man, much of what the community expected were things either directly shown or confirmed in interviews.

True that, every moment where you aren’t on foot, however, great.

Nice, I love seeing people get enthused by Shadow Hearts 2, it’s one of a kind...

Panzer Dragoon saga should be on the list, but I understand that it’s difficult to actually play the damn thing due to price/availability.

For anyone wanting to get into PC VR this is quite the deal.

For anyone wanting to get into PC VR this is quite the deal.

If a company that states it welcomes feedback insults and accuses people delivering feedback of sexism with no cause, then yes they are being attacked.

You missed the point, they did decide what they were going to do, but because they weren’t in the office they couldn’t pull her in and fire her.

Except his comment was insulting. You are choosing to ignore that detail. He didn’t “offer an idea”. He said she was wrong and told her how he would handle it. That insulted her.

“That’s not true. The online mob was demanding she be fired. ArenaNer can retroactively claim otherwise... but that’s them simply trying to save face. “

In no way am I dismissing any other part of the article besides the opening where they state she was fired due to a mob and misrepresenting what the original commenter said.

started simply because they choose to fire her simply due to an online mob demanding it.” 

Still spinning the narrative that Price was defending herself from “a YouTuber, for explaining the concept of dialogue choices to her” as if that happened.

Kotaku still running with the narrative that she’s the victim after she was fired for hurling insults at their community and partners. It’s a shame.