Right. And Hillary was going to win in a landslide. The one thing I have to give liberals is your capacity for delusional thinking is truly top-notch.

I doubt if my comments are what made you contemplate what you’re doing with your life.

See mine below, Welfare Queen. I bet you have four post-grad degrees and work for Black Ops in addition to being a “Senior analyst” and Consultant, right?

Sure you do, sure you do. It’s the internet, I’m sure you’re exactly what you say you are, Welfare Queen. That’s why you don’t understand how boycotts are supposed to work.

You don’t know how statistics work, do you? You don’t need to have every piece of data in the set to have a valid sample size. The numbers are valid. If you have any other dataset that’s comparable, let’s see it.

See mine, Welfare Queen.

I’m sure that this passes for wit while your standing in line for welfare but for the rest of the society, it’s sad.

You can always delete yourself and save us all from having to clean up whatever mess you make next.

Your lying again. The actual FBI data compiles stats from 2009 - 2013 and deals only with actual charged crimes.

No, your economic impact will be $0 and won’t be felt. If your “boycott” was worth shit, Kaep would be signed somewhere.

So your idea of having a discussion is to spout complete bullshit, pat yourself on the back for “protesting” something that doesn’t care about it, and then refuse to engage in any meaningful discussion about your little “protest.”

LMAO - Here’s a stat for you. Black cops shoot black kids at a HIGHER rate than white cops do.

Sure, you can just delete your post.

You can argue about what the number means, if anything, but you can’t “misuse” it because it’s just a number.

Sure it does. If I live in an area where schools are funded via property tax, I may end up paying a hugely disproportionate share of tax money for education when I may not even have children.

For starters, because the investor was probably already taxed on his income, then invested his money, and then gets taxed on it again. That’s why CG is only 15% and even that’s too much.

You’re just making stuff up. First you said the FBI/DOJ numbers were merely arrests, and that’s false and it’s easy to show you’re lying about that one:

Whites don’t because, generally, white people don’t get irate every time a white guy gets killed by cops and blame it on a racist conspiracy. They tend to think if the cops shot someone, they probably had it coming. I think they feel exactly the same way when blacks are shot.

The fact it is “incomplete” doesn’t mean it’s entirely invalid. It’s a decent sample size. It’s a lot more than you’ve provided. What evidence do you have the numbers in the article are misleading or false?

LOL - OK, then, you tell me how many of those charged (and the FBI stats are based on the most serious charge, not merely arrest) were convicted and/or pled to a crime?