Maybe the union jobs are actually comparable. That other wage gap is a useless statistic that compares all work, no matter type or hours worked. It’s less than useless, it’s propaganda.

So, Obama was bad for women?

Hey don’t sell yourselves short, you also treat many human beings who were born in the US with contempt.

I dunno. She may. She isn’t the person self-reflective enough to understand when to just stop and go away.

~reminder~

Because the Dems are so bad, are such failures, they’d be totally unable to put up a fight. There’s a reason why they’re known for snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.

If Democrats can do anything, it can turn a “can’t lose” situation into an absolute failure.

We’re talking about politicians here. Corruption is like emissions from internal combustion engines - it just comes with the package. You have to put up with it for the power. I don’t mind a little corruption because you can’t ever get rid of it. What matters is effectiveness, and by that measure the Republicans are…

That’s what I mean. Her time is over, but she can still fuck things up even worse.

They aren’t doing anything because they are more of the same inept shitheads the R’s have. The only difference is that the R side at least has a message that people can rally around. Yes it’s racist and nationalist as fuck but it’s something. The D’s don’t even have that.

I just assumed we were stuck with him for 8 years.

In a rigged system. By Clinton.

I don’t wonder at all. He absolutely can win in 2020. The DNC hasn’t fixed one goddamn thing. Not one. They’re doing what they did leading up to 2004. Trying to tattle on the bad Republicans and position themselves near the door so they can run out of the room when the fighting begins.

I’ve come to this slow realization over the last several weeks - if he runs, he will win again. The EC is perfectly set up to keep a republican in the whitehouse, and he has the unwavering support of at least 50 million voters.

Not sure why more proof was needed, but ok. You go, Donna Brazile.

That’s the administration’s logic???

Similar logic is applied in other cases. Challenges to the Clinton era assault weapons ban were thrown out because the plaintiffs hadn’t actually been arrested with an illegal weapon and thus had no standing to sue.

That’s like saying a defendant can’t appeal his death sentence because he hasn’t been executed yet.

The argument is that there is no standing because no injury has occurred. It’s pretty common in cases like this to challenge standing first, but best case scenario it would only delay the lawsuit and it typically doesn’t work (like in this case) when there is a stated date the plaintiff can point to and say, “the…

Thank goodness Trump is such an incompetent buffoon. A non-dumb politician with his power and lack of beliefs or morality would have done so much more damage by now.