riotsquirrelzzz
nuttier than squirrel poo
riotsquirrelzzz

Growing up in the pacific NW, I feel like keeping warm is really difficult, even though the temperatures don't drop that low. That's because it's always 40 degrees and raining and that wet means that you are cold-to-the-bone and can't warm up! There never seemed to be anything completely adequate for that situation.

Now playing

As the esteemed gentleman John Oliver has already pointed out, The Right to be Forgotten has, and will always have, the complete opposite effect. I for one hope this shithead (not John Oliver, the subject of this post, duh) continues his whining loudly, often, and in recorded public forums.

In the words of one federal prosecutor:

Best gif party of the year!!!

Yo, commenters, I'm really happy for you and I'm'a let you finish..... but where on earth are the MRA's defending this poor, hard done by dude who clearly needs advocates??

I feel like this needs a response similar to the whole Kirby Delauter thing. Why is he referred to as "Revenge Porn Dude" in the title of this article? It should be "Craig Brittain, Revenge Porn Dude."

Just. Craig Brittain. Everywhere. Craig Brittain Horrible Human Being. Craig Brittain, Expired Dick Cheese. Craig

Seriously. Fuck that guy.

Not to be totally juvenile but

i bet theres a Monster energy drink tattoo underneath that t shirt.

Ever have one of those singluar laughs that is so incredibly loud and almost painful that you think you just ruptured an organ?

I believe this story is the definition of schadenfreude for me.

Ah how my gif library will grow, thanks to this stupid twatfest's karmic retribution :]

Well, its a pretty dumb move any way you cut it. Its not like the victims put the nudes up themselves. They ostensibly gave them to this guy under false pretenses (him pretending to be a woman) with the expectation that they were meant to be a private communication. His status as the focus of a an FTC investigation is

Apparently, Mr. Hankey isn't the only talking turd from Colorado!

It seems pretty cut and dry to me too. I think this strategy is to argue that if he can't get his criminal past excised from the internet, his victims shouldn't be able to get their nudes taken down either. I think it will backfire, but I think that's his aim.

Is this like how all those girls who wanted their info and photos off his website and he refused and attempted to charge them to remove it?