Ah yes, the 1906 Transformers movie, where they transform into cable cars and cause an earthquake in San Francisco.

The single best thing about that scene (aside from the Tuesday line) is that Bison swaps his black evil dictator hat for his red relaxin’ evil dictator hat. Although the fact that he makes elaborate mixed cocktails for him and Chun-Li while not saying anything or really drawing attention to it is also great.

Do you recall any good streets, at least?

Van Damme and Seagal both had that couple years in the late 80s to early 90s where they were trying to be the next big action star.  They were as A-list as you could get for guys in movies that fought Ninjas and drug cartels with Karate

I saw Another 48 Hours in a discount theater that closed soon afterward when a rat bit a patron.

Time Cop!

In that case I’m sorry you had to read it, but I am not sorry for my feelings!

This reads like an apology from an ex-apologist.

Video games are difficult to turn into movies because the stories in video games aren’t generally designed to be put into movie form; they work best when taking in the story over a long period of time as a reason for the game play to exist. A “good” video game story is still a bad movie. 

The fox was a snitch for that Alpaca gang, they had it coming. Prison life is no joke.

Sad yes. But if you are addicted to meth you shouldn’t be having babies, let alone caring for them. She needs to face the consequences for her selfish actions.

How much wood could a wood chuck chuck if wood chuck read Ayn Rand.

“Scarlett deciding to pull out was a good example of listening to the community and that was the right thing to do,” said Rhys Ernst

Again (since you posted it twice), I think he’s her current boyfriend.  Little detail you left out.

It is important. But I don’t think the article is saying that. It’s not this guy who was holding the cell phone, but he’s in the title. And even if it is a discussion, you understand that by choosing to discuss this case, especially at the height of its frenzy, we are saying that the discussion is more important than…

But isn’t that because he didn’t really do anything wrong?

And I don’t believe your article is a better response than not responding at all. You’re also continuing the whole saga. You’re outright stating that it’s dangerous to second-guess intentions and then immediately second-guessing his intentions.  This isn’t right.  

So Euan Holden is one of two people to have his privacy invaded, he handles it well, he never encourages the harassment of the other person involved, and he is now the perpetrator because, what, he couldn’t stop people from being jerks?

It sounds cheeky, but it’s really just a way of saying, “I won’t comment on that either way,” which is the only way of handling questions like that. If you answer, even to say no, they’ll ask you a question about the next person you’re photographed with, and the next. And the moment you can’t say “no,” that means…

What’s so bad about him enjoying his moment in the spotlight?  He never said her name, never encouraged people to find her and contact her, never said they hooked up (“A gentleman never tells” is a cliche line that likely would be the only thing he could say to get the questions to stop).  If he was fine with the…