Exactly. And he didn’t just look out the window and at the gauges where he would have immediately seen that the plane was low and slow.

Interesting idea, but I guarantee that even if Tesla changes the name, the next crash will receive an equal amount of criticism about the entire feature from people who’ve never used it.

People who own the car seem to universally love it and the great majority of them seem to know how to use it properly (give how infrequent these Tesla crashes occur compared to all the miles they are driven).

If you keep a hand on the wheel like you’re supposed to, you’ll immediately feel when the car is starting to do the wrong thing and gently guide it back. No drama or stress. I’ve been doing this for several months in an ‘18 Accord with lane keeping.

I figured as much. Tesla Autopilot has proven to be a reliable system most of the time, and the deadly crashes that have happened with it seem to be from a combination of unusual factors, like the sunlight behind the white semi in that other bad one.

Wrong. It does serve a useful purpose and does reduce the drivers workload and fatigue, even though you do have to watch the road at all times. I’ve read this take on it from many Tesla owners. They speak of arriving at their destination much more refreshed. The car takes care of all those annoying steering and…

I’m a big proponent of self-driving vehicles but I have to agree. Either the LIDAR or the computer failed to do the right thing, and that person sitting behind the wheel blew it bad as well.

Agree 100%.

You are making a big jump to conclusions here. Accelerated methods have been used on countless bridges successfully for many years. Going fast does not necessarily mean cheap. Often, it’s more expensive. But they have to be engineered right, and they have to be constructed right. Let the investigation figure out what…

I think you hit the nail on the head. They know Trump’s time is running out. Heck, he might not even make it until May. And KJU is way smarter and more strategic than Trump. He will eat him for lunch.

You don’t understand the point, because that is NOT a flying car. I mean it DOES fly, but so does a Beetle pushed out of a cargo plane, at least for a while.

If it happens to someone else, they are just whining. If it happens to you, there will be hell to pay.

Here’s what I would say: Don’t persecute the guy for things he did 40 years ago in a much different culture and time. But we can’t honor him either. Not now, in the middle of a critically important movement, especially considering how widely known Bushnell was for this behavior. We can’t honor him when the first…

Seriously? Is that really her?

I agree with you on the front of the Camry... heck any current-model Toyota or Lexus for that matter. They are going way too far down the “edgy” path. I think the interior of the Camry is no different. It just looks odd. In contrast, the interior of the Accord is clean, classy, and looks more like a luxury car than a…

I’d also say the styling of the Accord is much better (I don’t like Toyota/Lexus edgy cylon-esque look) and the interior and infotainment is leagues better on the Accord. Just Toyota’s refusal to offer Android Auto and CarPlay is a deal-killer for me.

Personally I haven’t found any downsides with this turbo. Power is there when I need it to be. Lag is not an issue. It is actually the first turbo engine I’ve ever owned, and I feel no obvious difference in engine response or noise from naturally-aspirated engines. I’m never reminded the turbo is there, except when I…

We had one of those. Bought it brand-new in 2005. Loved that car.

Have you driven one? The 2.0 will surprise you. I was anti-4 cylinder as well, but bought the 2.0 a month ago and haven’t looked back.

We picked up our 2.0 Touring in December. Great design, great power, every feature you could ask for, the tech works great, the interior is stellar, and the transmission performs incredibly well. Honda really knocked it out of the park.