He does, do you? You seem confused.

The point zoomed right over your pointy head. And the number is much closer than that.

“In 2007, the numbers were 1,640 female victims to 700 male victims.” of intimate partner violence. And no, the gays can’t up this number much.

In 2007, the numbers were 1,640 female victims to 700 male victims.

Be real. On a story where a woman is murdered, you see attempt to politicize it. Then whines when the politics are disputed.

Nope. 3.5 times. He showed the math.

A deadly disease that nobody gets isn’t much of a problem. A less deadly disease that lots of people get is a problem. That’s why your disease analogy is silly.

In 2007, the numbers were 1,640 female victims to 700 male victims.

Slut.

I love your “lalalalalalalalala”

Which prove his point that yes, women don’t do it as often as men, but they do it pretty damned often. What’s your problem?

“In 2007, the numbers were 1,640 female victims to 700 male victims.”

“In 2007, the numbers were 1,640 female victims to 700 male victims.”

Nope, more like 4 to 1.

“In 2007, the numbers were 1,640 female victims to 700 male victims.”

“In 2007, the numbers were 1,640 female victims to 700 male victims.”

How is his math “bad”? He never claimed that women did it more or the same. He said that women do it often.

Which is what he said, silly.

Maybe, just maybe, you should read the thread, silly. “In 2007, the numbers were 1,640 female victims to 700 male victims.”

And? His point wasn’t that women do it the same, it was that women do it a lot too. They do. “In 2007, the numbers were 1,640 female victims to 700 male victims.”

Not much they don’t: “In 2007, the numbers were 1,640 female victims to 700 male victims.”