Ah, no worries. I’ve just seen you made a comment exactly the same as my reply to you in an earlier thread, so we’re in furious agreement.

If it means you can have one car rather than two, the tree-huggers should be happy about it.

We’re not talking about a fixed hardtop here though, are we? We're talking about a hardtop car that you can turn into a no-top car with the push of a button. If you want a car that you can drive without a roof and it's your only car (like my mum's NC MX-5), then a retractable hardtop makes a lot of sense as it turns…

It’s just depressing as a Ricciardo fan. Hints of light at the end of the tunnel, then it turns out to be a train.

I’ve got a photo of an “OMGWTF” plate on a Ford Falcon somewhere.

And he can rip some pretty impressive fills too (his playing on Songs For The Deaf is his best drum work I think).

I wonder how Bezos would react to that. I assume Volvo retains use for vehicles.

The trick with the tattoo is to get a Kerry King demon-face on the back of your head. That way you can't look down at it and regret it.

Maybe a bit left-field, but how about a 2006 SAAB 9-3 turbo?

“Maybe a non holy grail ZJ”

It’s an anti-sleeper - it's a sports car, which to most people means it's a fast car. It just isn't fast.

Didn’t you know that George Soros uses his space laser for fun sometimes?

This comment deserves more stars.

Well whaddaya know...

Jason, on the subject of VW engine fidelity, I thought you might find this intriguing:

I believe that’s a Swedish-pattern pipe wrench:

There’s a current Lancer?

It’s easy to be magnanimous when you're winning...

A Crosstrek with a WRX drivetrain (and a Levorg with a manual) would be very welcome additions to Subaru’s line-up.

On that matter, don't Hyundai now own Boston Dynamics?