The offset is apparently so that St Andrew's saltire isn't just a border for St Patrick's. Still looks odd.
The offset is apparently so that St Andrew's saltire isn't just a border for St Patrick's. Still looks odd.
Maybe they’re signalling that they’re in dire trouble?
The Flag Code doesn’t actually say anything about flying the flag with the Union to the front on vehicles as far as I can see. Haas are displaying the flag in a manner consistent with military convention (DA PAM 670-1).
(Yes, I know this is humorous, but the Union Jack isn’t actually symmetrical...)
That’s a fair assessment. Though I'd contend that it’s still likely a larger segment of the market than it is anywhere other than Europe or Africa. Whether that's a failure is up to the observer I suppose.
Extremely high precision fuelling systems that were able to contravene flow rate restrictions without detection?
Exactly - I would have thought that EVs suit the rugged individualists of Texas down to the ground - put a shit-ton of solar panels on your roof, and you can charge your car without the intervention of the state, then power your house from your car. There's no need to even have an electrical grid in that case.
Cowgirls?
1) Alpine: Nice colour choice, if expected. Alpine graphics well-utilised.
What a ridiculous statement by Beloussov.
Diesel fuel didn't work in the US?
Might not be there for long anyway:
Chevron and Shell are investing too.
Or white, blue and red?
Short of some incredible breakthrough, the next set of regulations will definitely not rely solely on battery power for the cars - the new engine formula is due in 2026, I believe.
Yes, that’s basically what it is. It makes some sense to create a fuel like this if you have access to massive amounts of excess energy (like from an enormous solar array), because it’s energy-dense compared to a battery. I wouldn’t be at all surprised if petrochemical energy companies are researching the shit out of…