rancorr
Rancorr
rancorr

“FWIW, no, I don’t think that someone’s television would get reclaimed. It’s a dumb argument, designed to show you how bad an idea it is to let Ferrari, or any other auto manufacturer, decide who gets to keep the vehicles they sell. Don’t sell them to whoever you want, I don’t care, but once money’s changed hands,

“Thats an entirely different set of circumstances full ownership vs leasing under contract. A lease isn’t ownership, and a contract that has a revocation of possession clause pertaining to the product on loan/lease is different than the earlier blanket statement of an owner having his property taken by non

“Giant difference between the authorities impounding one’s vehicle for these kinds of actions, and the manufacturer of said vehicle doing so because they don’t like the way you drive. One is a legal process, one is not. I agree that it’s not the manufacturers place to take people’s stuff away. Where does it end?

“Wait, are you saying that you are ok with a corporation, participating in a free-market society, reserving the right to reclaim a property that was sold to a private citizen?”

Now playing

Oh, the old “You weren’t smart enough to understand” schtick. Nice.

Now playing

“...parents went away on a week’s vacation...”?

“I would recoil in horror at a world where cars can be re-possessed just because someone doesn’t approve of how it’s used.”

Wow. She’s ... I don’t know ... is inspirational too strong a word? Sausage, chicken? No, this woman smells like charisma. I wish her nothing but success but I think there’s no need to wish it. I think she’s making it just fine without wishing. Thanks for the intro. I’m always suspicious about people with reality

Yeah, I’m not a fan of Jenna Marbles (not in the passive-aggressive ‘not a fan because I hate her’ way; merely the more tame ‘I’m just not that into her stuff’ way) but regardless of this, she still seems like a perfectly amicable soul who is probably great to get drunk with and be intentionally stupid.

I got more of a laugh reading your comment than anything I’ve seen or heard from Ms. Awfulness.

I assumed exactly that. And I’m Canadian.

Hey, not that I need any additional motivation to not shame people for their weight (hey, I got my own metabolic shizz but mine’s the more socially-accepted though still somewhat mocked flip side of yours) but thanks for cluing me in to another reason to mind my tongue. I had no idea about PCOS. Now, I do. Thanks for

It is indeed my first day. Everything is so shiny and new! And this Mackeeper thing looks like a really good service.

That’s great and all but it changes nothing about ad hominem arguments. Using them may feel satisfying but they weaken an argument, not bolster it.

Ehm, can we not take one person to be representative of an entire nation’s intellect? Thanks.

“If you are going to publish damaging information that can’t be proven other than what your source says. Lets put their name out there as well. Make the source has some skin in the game.”

“You seem like the kind of person who compares things to Hitler and Nazis as your go to argument.”

Legal definitions = not universal.

It’s amazing how many people don’t realize that distinction is based purely on jurisdiction, not a universal legal description. In Texas, what is pictured in the video is assault, according to the state penal code — one which does not refer to battery at all — which you can find here:

Well, that’s probably not going to help his career. Funny people are great and all but sometimes the creep factor is hard to overlook.