rainbowmacaw
ScarletMcCawBirdDetective
rainbowmacaw

Probably, but I think there are also a lot of men who:

Hey, idiots. If you don’t want to put your livelihood in jeopardy, DON’T HARASS WOMEN. Or anyone else. Christ, it’s not that hard of a concept to grasp.

I doubt any of these fine, upstanding gentlemen suddenly started shutting women out as punishment. It’s a lot more likely they’ve always shut women out and blamed women’s lack of intelligence or their bitchiness or the fact that they were only hired because of affirmative action. They’ve just found a new way to

Yes, some are. As a man in his 50s, I have concluded that there is a certain breed of men in my generation and older who are simply incapable of understanding how sexual harassment works. I feel like it’s a knee-jerk reaction to how sexual politics have changed so much since we were raised and things that were

I had a really disturbing conversation with a friend who said she would not “allow” her husband to have dinner with young female colleagues. Aside from the fact that she apparently can’t trust her husband if he’s off-leash, that is the kind of shit that holds women back at work. People really can work together without

No, it’s passive-egressive behavior. They are shutting women out as punishment for their colleagues’ not being allowed to do whatever they want to them.

But what about that sweet, sweet rape money? How do we get that? I was told there would be certain benefits to speaking out against sexual harassment and I’m just not seeing it. How’s a bitch supposed to get ahead?

So basically, women lose. Women always lose. Fan-fucking-tastic.

Damned trog on Twitter wrote that these women coming forward now are lying and disgusting because they didn’t come forward earlier. Cannot even see the irony in his comment.

Just like the scared college bros who are afraid to talk to girls because they could be labelled rapists! Men are the true victims here.

One investor, who spoke anonymously with the NYT, says that a “big chill came across Silicon Valley” as stories about sexual harassment and assault at tech companies became public. They claimed that people were now canceling networking meetings and even casual coffee dates with women and minorities, because there is

So, I introduced this show to my parents in the first season because I thought it would totally be their thing, and guess what? It was! Which is great, I love when I give successful recommendations.

I know it’s an unpopular opinion around here but despite being a feminist and a straight woman I’m actually not bothered by nudity in movies, “gratuitous” or not. It would be great it there was more shlong though ;)

I don’t understand why it would be less appealing to women though, unless it is mostly drawing people who have seen the original and maybe that fan base is mostly male?

They can bring back the intermission when they stop showing me 20 minutes of commercials when my movie is supposed to start

The first one didn’t do much business at the box office and attained more of a cult following than the typical movie that receives a sequel.

So where was he, and the rest of the conservative community when Roger Ailes, and Bill O’reilly were exposed? Oh, that’s right, the were busy painting the women who came forward as money hungry, attention whores. And don’t forget, Trump called Ailes a fine man, and hired him as an advisor.

To be frank though Dumbledore only “saw the light” when his sister got killed and then tried to use a child as a weapon by making him hate life through placing him with an abusive family for over a decade.

Don Jr thinks he so fucking smart. I can barely tell what he’s trying to say, but he’s that kid in your intro psych class who is the biggest douchecanoe and thinks he’s constantly outwitting the professor. Bonus points if that professor is a woman.

“The most sympathetic reading of this situation is that Sunderland got lost in a kind of journalism that has always existed, but is more prevalent in our current political landscape; writers intent on fully understanding a controversial issue ingratiating themselves with the “other side” to present a comprehensive