Right, I’m not understanding the outrage here.

How the information is framed is dumb, as pointed out, breasts are not “for men”, but males and females have primary and secondary sexual characteristics in order to advertise fertility, maturity, and health in both sexes that developed for the purpose of advertising to…

In every other primate a enlarged breast is a sign of lactation . Only humans maintain permanent breasts. Most biologists assume this anomaly is due to selective pressure from ancient males due to its rarity in the animal kingdom. So, evolutionarily speaking, it could be and likely is true that permanent breasts in…

That’s wrong. Evolutionary scientists have known for long that female human breasts are so extremely big and protuding compared with the breasts of other apps and chimpanzees only for sexual appeal. The theory goes that breasts evolved to that unnatural size to keep male partners more engaged during sex and more…

sorry, you are wrong. Nipples are for babies. Breast size has no correlation with milk production. Women don’t grow breasts to feed babies. Cats don’t have breasts but still feed their young. The concept of sexualisation is a social construct. in evolutionary biology breast are known as fertility indicators. Meant to…

which is silly since Canada can create it’s own gas

Good on you for having perspective neighbor.

Well the theory only holds up when there aren’t other things to consider - like social standing, cultural pressures and higher cognitive levels. I mean small feet - who would think that has an attractiveness value that is tied to evolution? It doesn’t and yet foot binding was an East Asian practice for centuries.

But the thing is, flat-chested women can nurse a baby just as well as large-chested women can. My mom is as flat as a board and very successfully nursed two children. As I understand it, only a little mammary tissue is actually needed for lactation. The rest has developed through natural selection because many men…

Don’t feel bad for the hive mind coming down you. You’re not wrong to answer the question. Big muscles on a guy are for strength AND they attract women biologically (looks like a provider / protector). Breasts on a woman serve the practical purpose of breast feeding but also attract men (looks like she will be a good…

How is advocating for non violence insensitive and embarrassing?

Sure, not equivalent, but Antifa maintains that violence is one of, if not the most, important tools they have, so fuck them both anyway. Violence begets violence and from what I’ve seen, extremism only bolsters extremists on the opposing side.

One of the central theses of our American system is freedom of thought. You are legally allowed to have all manner of vile and unpopular thoughts, ideas and opinions without the fear of violent recrimination from the government or fellow citizens.

Guess what? Most people are centrist so you’re in for a looooong ride.

There’s no moral equivalent but people are still allowed to oppose them based on their opposition to violence.

Antifa either doesn’t exist, doesn’t represent the Left, or is doing God’s work, depending on what day it is and what narrative needs to be pushed.

Well, that’s a bummer. Her original tweet was quite proper in condemning those who would resort to violence.

Interesting... because antifa should be exempt from criticism? Or exempt from criticism by celebrities? What is the takeaway here?

It’s hard because we don’t get to be as self righteous about celebrity gossip but at least it puts an end to this awful woke call out culture.

Her tweet was fine.

Droid names make no sense, regardless. If the series holds, and assuming the phonetic Aurebesh also contains 26 “letters” and the Galactic Basic system of counting is base-10, then there could only ever be 260 of each series before naming became redundant. Maybe there’s an R2-Z3500 out there, but canonically there’s…