+1000 for Blazing Saddles!

not surprised, but still completely pissed off.

Seems to be a legit question there. Why isn’t he telling the judge whatever she needs to hear to get his kids out of jail?

Supervised visitation is indicative. It’s a logical assumption.

You aren’t being attacked. We’re having a debate. Like the way no one has threatened you, or called you terrible names? That indicates a total lack of attack.

Quote them then. I don’t see much of that going on in this thread, but maybe I missed it.

Again, her comments were meaningless in the context of her egregious actions. She was utterly abusive towards those children, and her behavior was totally aberrant. You want to think I should be concerning myself with her statements about the father, go right ahead.

Actually, it was you that suggested it wasn’t his fault, because the judge said so.

Her contempt order should have been aimed at no one, since she had zero grounds for such a thing.

I’m sorry, but I think sidetracks into whether the father is really a good guy or whatever are both unknowable, and irrelevant. You keep bringing it up though.

The judge saying it doesn’t really mean anything, since she also told them they were like a cult of brutal murderers, and then proceeded to be emotionally abusive in ways that should require a restraining order against her. So deciding her word means it’s not “his fault” seems like quite a leap.

Yeah, you live in a thing called a “society,” sweetheart. You don’t get to live in a society where you expect people to show up and help you when your house is on fire or you break your damned leg, and then argue how everything is all about you. So take your individual nonsense argument and shove it somewhere dark and…

So? What do the father’s wishes have to do with this? The children have been put in jail by an abusive judge. I really don’t care if both of the parents are the worst people alive. The children are the issue here.

And that has what to do with the children needing to be in jail?

Nobody is talking about the fucking mother, last time I checked this thread. We’re talking about the CHILDREN, who are in JAIL.

The children are the victims. I don’t have enough information to be concerned with the mother either way.

The cost of coverage can’t really have gone “up” since obviously the people with no coverage were already paying with their long-term health and lives. Your question seems basically meaningless. Cost has gone up according to whom? According to what metric? In comparison to what? Your original question was so vague as…

The stats on the different treatment between blacks and whites in every essential area of existence, from housing discrimination, to employment discrimination, to incarceration rates, to appropriate healthcare are fully available, and well documented. You not bothering to research them is your personal failure.

Exactly. This woman is an abusive nut, using her judicial power to torment children. She needs to be disbarred, like, yesterday.

By putting them in jail.