quiddity
quiddity
quiddity

Honestly, I felt like the game was marketed at E3 dishonestly. I thought it looked fantastic too, when I saw the footage and assumed it was a single player segment. But its multiplayer only, which is fine, but it means I probably wont get it and I'm sure a lot of people would have been less happy with the game if that

I highly, highly recommend Black Lagoon. It's incredibly violent and has some really dark content (especially Roberta's Blood Trail), but if you are fine with that you are in for one the best anime that's come out in the past few years.

This is a really cool feature. I hope you guys plan to include some Dota 2 coverage in the future!

And... the exact same can be said for most feminists (at least the ones I've engaged with) the moment you bring up a male-centric issue. I've never ever dismissed women's issues but you better believe the amount of "Deal with it, you were born with a penis" types of attitudes you see, without even trying to understand

The assumptions!! My god the assumptions are killing me! I could go on about how much time I've spent on the subject but you've probably already made up your mind on me based on one sentence.

Honestly, I've kinda decided to just stop discussing feminism because of all the backlash you get if you say one thing in disagreement.

Since that post ran a bit long, let me add that League of Legends (and other games like it, like Dota 2) is completely ok with player streams. It's pretty much what keeps the entire scene alive and definitely makes more money for LoL/Dota in the long run.

Here is a statement from Youtube about it:

I was really interested in Titanfall before I heard it was going to be multiplayer only. Ah well. Makes my decision to get a X1 later on in 2014 easier.

I wish I did that with AC3... My inner-fanboy made me get the digital deluxe edition with the season pass. So disappointing. I ignored the reviews and what people were telling me because I had so much faith in AC.

It does make a difference honestly. A lot of times, I just want to play something quick for a while. Something like an SF4 match. However that usually means I have to get up to swap discs. So instead I play Super Stardust HD which is already on my HDD.

Or, better, can't Microsoft give disc-based gamers the choice to register their games online and then enjoy the benefits of sharing and expanded access knowing what they're giving up in exchange?

You don't need a 24 check to check for abuse... Steam has a one time activation for all its games.

Yes, exactly. I wanted Steam in console form.

As I've noted in my other posts, I want to be able to launch my games without the disc (which is what they initially said was possible) because I'm a lazy SOB.

I lived for quite some time in a country where these companies treated us like 3rd class citizens... It might not matter to you but it really does suck for a lot of people living abroad. And considering I'll probably be buying one of these sometime later for my little brother who still lives in said country, region

True, but console games generally get better deals from retailers. Also, I like game boxes on my shelf. It makes me feel all fuzzy inside when I look upon my collection.

But I'm LAZY! Swapping discs is annoying...

Yeah, but I wanted it to run directly from the HDD. Discs are a bit annoying aside from having them sit neatly on my shelf.

Oh, I'm aware of that. The reason I wanted installs and no disc for retail is because you tend to find better deals on retail copies of games compared to digital copies on consoles, and because I like having game boxes on my shelf. I realize I'm the selfish one here that wants everything (though I was willing to give