If I made a video about surfing on the biggest wave ever, would you tell me that your problem with the video is that I'm not representing the average waves and that this is in a tiny minority of waves? What if I took a video of my dog learning a really cool trick that isn't common in dogs, would you tell me that…

The fact that you don't see the difference between sending out a man's details and sending out a woman's details in a deeply misogynistic society is mind-boggling.

Nothing she did was illegal. Even calling his parents is nt illegal. Telling his school is not illegal. Finding his information over the internet and posting it is not illegal. She did not attack him in any way, shape, or form, so the analogy you keep making isn't relevant. More like a kid bullies your kid at school,…

Interestingly, I've only ever seen emotional used positively for men which also backs you up. When a man is emotional, he's compassionate and kind. When a woman is emotional, she's irrational and unable to lead.

I think it's a little unfair to expect the woman to try to solve all problems of the world with her child in a 1-minute video. Maybe she's addressing people her daughter is familiar with and women outside the video, where the rest of her life is lived minus this one minute. And to be fair, predators are mostly men, so…

Once my mother was babysitting two little kids, one around 5 and the other around this little girl's age. She called me to laugh about how the younger one was saying "no" to everything, even things she would want, and asked the kid "do you want some ice cream?" the younger one said "no!"...then the older one overheard…

"Bossy" is coded speech though, which makes it worse. Because if you call someone a bitch, everyone knows you're being disrespectful and inappropriate and they see the connection between "woman" and "bitch". But bossy, people don't notice that they only apply it to women, they don't notice its gendered nature and what…

He's a HOST too. So much for elevated discourse.

I'd always thought it was working in the fitness industry yet here she is denying it.

Well, as long as you don't think it is. Luckily, the stronger side of oppression will back you up on that, so you can sit comfy and judge women for reacting to the rape threats thrown at them. The best part about siding with oppressors is that you never have to question it if you don't want to!

"Real equality" is when women are not flooded by rape threats day in day out for just existing as women on the internet. Not when men get to anonymously send rape threats with no repercussions to women.

It's really convenient that those "common sense" aphorisms like "take the higher road" and "two wrongs don't make a right" fall right in line with forcing the marginalized to ignore their marginalization. That is taking the side of the oppressors.

Are you suggesting...he threatened to rape her and then posted her details? Because yeah the article calling him out would probably exist then as well. Or it wouldn't because it's so "normal" for men to doxx the "sluts" they hate on the internet, with revenge porn and such, that someone threatening to rape a woman and…

As someone who can easily get lost in hunting achievements, I can't stand the achievements that are gotten just by beating the game. I can maybe understand one achievement for beating story mode, but it's so dumb when I beat the game for the first time and in the process get half the achievements.

I think it's not just because eSports is such a big deal - this isn't really a thing in regular sports as far as I know. I think it's the balance - eSports is big enough stakes that it's important for you to do well and win, but not so big that if you fail you have a backup, like other pro athletes have with…

Eh, I've done it and what bothers me about it is that nothing I have for a business casual arrangement is nice because hell if I'm spending out the nose for two entirely different wardrobes and then because it's not nice, I'm self-conscious and uncomfortable all day. I'm sure if I went out and dropped a thousand bucks…

How could you possibly claim that a meritocracy still exists and then in the same breath talk about how dressing up is catering to prejudices? Those special meritocratic prejudices I guess.

Everything you're saying is just as irrelevant as it was from the first comment, sorry. :/

I understand the concept. I'm saying it shouldn't be that way, because I should be judged on the job I do, not on how well-fitting my slacks are. When you make that judgment, you automatically destroy any shred of a meritocracy because instead of judging people on their job you're judging them on something completely…

See, I'm not arguing against the argument you're making, that a lot people see it as more professional and thus wearing it in instances where those people have an effect on your job is practical. What I'm arguing is those people that are judging you as an employee on the clothes you wear instead of the work you do are…