If Carlos won’t have a garage and has to street park, he should be looking at the shortest cars that can still feasibly work for him.
If Carlos won’t have a garage and has to street park, he should be looking at the shortest cars that can still feasibly work for him.
You’re the one who replied to me to tell me that a stock is not a liquid asset because the only liquid asset is cash.
“I was saying that converting an asset to cash, typically through sale, will result in taxes incurred.”
“Short comment doesn’t mean you didn’t convey volumes.”
“when he was run over by an HPD SUV”
As I’ve said in a few responses I’m not necessarily advocating for a wealth tax.
I’m not necessarily advocating for a wealth tax.
I understand perfectly the difference between the value of a stock one owns and income.
“Liquid” is not a technical financial term. Cash is obviously the embodiment of a liquid asset but people generally refer to anything that can be converted to cash quickly and without significant sacrifice in value as being “liquid.”
I don’t have a version. I am not necessarily advocating for a wealth tax and have concerns about the prospect of one as I have most of my investments in very illiquid investments.
Weird that you’re scolding others for “not understanding money” and then go on to imply stock shares aren’t a liquid asset.
“Military weapon” has a very different meaning now, compared to prior eras.
Yup, imagine the US figures without California. Or Tesla’s existence as a company.
I wonder how much the driver grossed from Uber payments for all that driving and how income parsed out after factoring in consumables and other expenses. Also wonder how something like a Toyota Camry would fare in comparison.
Reminds me of the Fiat 500e, which had even less range and was smaller than almost all Americans want and they managed to sell 5,000+ per year for a handful of years by selling them cheap. At a loss, I would assume. I remember some dealerships having lease deals on them as cheap as $100/month.
Right on. The same life change accelerated the same mentality change in me.
Yeah if he’s pulling around $3 million in annual income, has been, and will in the future, with tens of millions in assets then yeah, that’s rich as fuck for anyone but the cartoonishly wealthy.
Yeah, pleasuring your sexual partner shouldn’t be seen as an act of fealty (unless it is and that’s someone’s kink), but the whole point of “quit sucking off Elon, it’s embarrassing” is to insinuate that the person is degrading themselves with something even lower than simply an act of fealty. Not that he’s sucking…
Was surprised that this was possible.
“Wait! Isn’t the specific dick one has chosen to suck relevant?”